Exploring Historical Reading of Textbook Narratives - Framework and Inquiry Questions for Deconstructive Reading -

The historical narrative explaining Goryeo’s foreign relations reveals how present-day frameworks influence the perception and interpretation of past historical events, selectively organizing evidence to construct plausible narratives. In particular, Myocheong’s attempt to relocate the capital to Seogyeong serves as a striking example of the shift in textbook narratives, transitioning from the dichotomous framework of “independence versus submission” (self-reliance versus subordination) to the framework of “pragmatic subordination.”<br/> This study critically examines textbook narratives that, as canonical explanatory frameworks, have persisted despite changes in curricula and textbooks by linking historical events and contexts in conventional ways. Using Myocheong’s Seogyeong capital relocation movement as a focal point, this study problematizes its representation in textbooks and employs deconstructive reading as a tool to reassess these narratives.<br/> This research explores the origins and development of textbook narratives regarding Myocheong’s movement, and critically analyzes the context of Goryeo’s relationship with the Jin dynasty through historian-driven, source-based questioning and deconstructive reading processes. To achieve this, this study adopts historians’ contextual reading strategies while investigating historical thinking and the process of generating historical questions. The ultimate goal is to illustrate how the interplay between historical sources and inquiry can shape learning activities for historical exploration.<br/> The findings of this study offer three key contributions. First, it provides concrete examples of historian-driven questioning and critical/deconstructive reading of textbook narratives. Second, it establishes a methodological framework for generating source-based inquiry questions grounded in historical analysis. Third, it proposes practical instructional strategies to support students’ engagement in deconstructive reading of textbook narratives, thereby contributing to the improvement of history education practices.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Korean History Education Review
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18622/kher.2025.06.174.1
Primary Topic
Educational Systems and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Historical Reading of Textbook Narratives - Framework and Inquiry Questions for Deconstructive Reading -

JongSuk Choi, Min‐Jung Kim
The Korean History Education Review
Educational Systems and Policies
article

Exploring Historical Reading of Textbook Narratives - Framework and Inquiry Questions for Deconstructive Reading -

JongSuk Choi, Min‐Jung Kim
article en

Abstract

The historical narrative explaining Goryeo’s foreign relations reveals how present-day frameworks influence the perception and interpretation of past historical events, selectively organizing evidence to construct plausible narratives. In particular, Myocheong’s attempt to relocate the capital to Seogyeong serves as a striking example of the shift in textbook narratives, transitioning from the dichotomous framework of “independence versus submission” (self-reliance versus subordination) to the framework of “pragmatic subordination.”<br/> This study critically examines textbook narratives that, as canonical explanatory frameworks, have persisted despite changes in curricula and textbooks by linking historical events and contexts in conventional ways. Using Myocheong’s Seogyeong capital relocation movement as a focal point, this study problematizes its representation in textbooks and employs deconstructive reading as a tool to reassess these narratives.<br/> This research explores the origins and development of textbook narratives regarding Myocheong’s movement, and critically analyzes the context of Goryeo’s relationship with the Jin dynasty through historian-driven, source-based questioning and deconstructive reading processes. To achieve this, this study adopts historians’ contextual reading strategies while investigating historical thinking and the process of generating historical questions. The ultimate goal is to illustrate how the interplay between historical sources and inquiry can shape learning activities for historical exploration.<br/> The findings of this study offer three key contributions. First, it provides concrete examples of historian-driven questioning and critical/deconstructive reading of textbook narratives. Second, it establishes a methodological framework for generating source-based inquiry questions grounded in historical analysis. Third, it proposes practical instructional strategies to support students’ engagement in deconstructive reading of textbook narratives, thereby contributing to the improvement of history education practices.

The Korean History Education ReviewVol. 174
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Educational Systems and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring Historical Reading of Textbook Narratives - Framework and Inquiry Questions for Deconstructive Reading - — JongSuk Choi, Min‐Jung Kim · The Korean History Education Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS