A systematic approach for identifying drivers of critical safety and establishing their hierarchy

Abstract Learning from incidents is a crucial step in preventing and mitigating adverse events. Incident databases offer valuable insights for safety management improvements by cause and contributing factors. However, extracting meaningful information from incident investigation reports poses a significant challenge. This study introduces a data‐driven methodology to assess drivers of critical safety (DCS), which is essential for enhancing the safety of the process industries and protecting workers and the environment. Natural language processing (NLP) can offer automated, actionable insights from incident investigation reports. This automation is important in identifying DCS from incident reports to ensure proactive prevention and effective mitigation of risks, thereby protecting assets, workers, and the environment. Based on lagging safety indicators (causes or contributing factors), we aim to develop leading safety improvements to enhance the safety management system. A crucial step involves developing a DCS hierarchy to assess their role within the overall safety management framework. This hierarchy quantifies the driving and dependence power of each driver. The former refers to the number of drivers affected by each driver, while the latter determines the number of drivers impacted by each driver. This hierarchy facilitates resource allocation and determines each driver's effectiveness in safety management. The tool is developed and trained using the publicly available CSB database, a comprehensive source of incident investigation data. To further verify the model's effectiveness, it is tested and verified on an unseen database of 26 release incidents released by CSB in January 2025. The model successfully identifies the DCS responsible for each incident.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.70029
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic approach for identifying drivers of critical safety and establishing their hierarchy

Faisal Irshad Khan, Paul Amyotte, Mohammad Zaid Kamil
4 citations
The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering
Risk and Safety Analysis
5.59
article

A systematic approach for identifying drivers of critical safety and establishing their hierarchy

Faisal Irshad Khan, Paul Amyotte, Mohammad Zaid Kamil
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Learning from incidents is a crucial step in preventing and mitigating adverse events. Incident databases offer valuable insights for safety management improvements by cause and contributing factors. However, extracting meaningful information from incident investigation reports poses a significant challenge. This study introduces a data‐driven methodology to assess drivers of critical safety (DCS), which is essential for enhancing the safety of the process industries and protecting workers and the environment. Natural language processing (NLP) can offer automated, actionable insights from incident investigation reports. This automation is important in identifying DCS from incident reports to ensure proactive prevention and effective mitigation of risks, thereby protecting assets, workers, and the environment. Based on lagging safety indicators (causes or contributing factors), we aim to develop leading safety improvements to enhance the safety management system. A crucial step involves developing a DCS hierarchy to assess their role within the overall safety management framework. This hierarchy quantifies the driving and dependence power of each driver. The former refers to the number of drivers affected by each driver, while the latter determines the number of drivers impacted by each driver. This hierarchy facilitates resource allocation and determines each driver's effectiveness in safety management. The tool is developed and trained using the publicly available CSB database, a comprehensive source of incident investigation data. To further verify the model's effectiveness, it is tested and verified on an unseen database of 26 release incidents released by CSB in January 2025. The model successfully identifies the DCS responsible for each incident.

The Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringVol. 103(10)
Dalhousie University (CA), Mary Kay (United States) (US)
WorkSafeBC, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Risk and Safety Analysis
5.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.