Assessing additive manufacturing suitability of metal parts: a geometry-focused methodology

Abstract Additive manufacturing (AM) has the potential to fundamentally change product engineering, enabling the substitution of conventional manufacturing processes. Nevertheless, determining whether transitioning to AM is feasible and advisable is a highly time-consuming and challenging process, influenced by various factors. Existing approaches often require extensive AM expertise or lack the depth needed for reliable conclusions. Therefore, this paper introduces a novel, quantitative methodology that simplifies and supports the decision-making process, primarily based on the part’s geometry. In particular, we evaluate the suitability of metal parts for powder bed fusion laser beam melting (PBF-LB/M) and direct energy deposition-arc metal (DED-Arc/M). The approach assesses three key aspects: manufacturability & adaptation effort, cost estimation, and part complexity. These factors are combined into a comprehensive AM suitability score, supporting informed decision-making. All necessary parameters and thresholds are provided and discussed in detail. Evaluation through expert reviews demonstrates the methodology’s accuracy, practicality, and broad applicability, making it an effective tool for both novice and experienced users.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Applied Sciences
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-07023-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing additive manufacturing suitability of metal parts: a geometry-focused methodology

Claudius Ellsel, Otto Maier, Dietmar Göhlich
1 citations
Discover Applied Sciences
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
0.68
article

Assessing additive manufacturing suitability of metal parts: a geometry-focused methodology

Claudius Ellsel, Otto Maier, Dietmar Göhlich
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Additive manufacturing (AM) has the potential to fundamentally change product engineering, enabling the substitution of conventional manufacturing processes. Nevertheless, determining whether transitioning to AM is feasible and advisable is a highly time-consuming and challenging process, influenced by various factors. Existing approaches often require extensive AM expertise or lack the depth needed for reliable conclusions. Therefore, this paper introduces a novel, quantitative methodology that simplifies and supports the decision-making process, primarily based on the part’s geometry. In particular, we evaluate the suitability of metal parts for powder bed fusion laser beam melting (PBF-LB/M) and direct energy deposition-arc metal (DED-Arc/M). The approach assesses three key aspects: manufacturability & adaptation effort, cost estimation, and part complexity. These factors are combined into a comprehensive AM suitability score, supporting informed decision-making. All necessary parameters and thresholds are provided and discussed in detail. Evaluation through expert reviews demonstrates the methodology’s accuracy, practicality, and broad applicability, making it an effective tool for both novice and experienced users.

Discover Applied SciencesVol. 7(7)
Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Technische Universität Berlin, European Regional Development Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.