Unilateral Hearing Loss: Listening Ability, Social Participation and Adaptive Strategies to Challenges in the Real World

Background: Unilateral hearing loss (UHL) is associated with speech-in-noise difficulties, impaired spatial hearing, and reduced social participation, yet conventional audiological assessments may not capture these real-world consequences. This study characterised the multidimensional functional impact of UHL using an ecologically oriented test battery and explored whether accessible behavioural and self-reported measures accounted for individual differences in speech-in-noise comprehension. Methods: Fifteen adults with moderate to profound sensorineural UHL and sixteen adults with normal hearing completed standardised questionnaires assessing hearing disability and social participation, an auditory reaction-time task in quiet and noise, the National Acoustic Laboratories Dynamic Conversations Test, head-orientation tracking, and post-task self-reports. Group differences were assessed using mixed-effects models and independent-samples t-tests. An exploratory regression examined speech-in-noise performance within the UHL group. Results: Participants with UHL reported greater hearing difficulties and social participation restrictions, and showed modestly poorer speech-in-noise comprehension although the UHL–NH difference in speech-in-noise comprehension was no longer statistically significant after adjustment for age. Reaction times were significantly longer in noise than in quiet but did not differ significantly between hearing groups. The UHL group also showed a significantly more pronounced head orientation towards the poorer-hearing side and greater within-participant head-orientation variability. An exploratory model combining reaction time in noise with three post-task self-report items showed strong apparent in-sample fit (adjusted R2 = 0.71). However, internal cross-validation of the complete model-selection procedure yielded substantially lower predictive performance (RCV2 = 0.19). Conclusions: UHL is associated with differences across complementary perceptual, behavioural, and self-reported dimensions of everyday communication. Multimodal functional assessment may provide information beyond conventional audiometry, although the exploratory model requires validation in larger, age-matched independent cohorts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Audiology Research
Published
2026-09-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres16050133
Primary Topic
Hearing Impairment and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unilateral Hearing Loss: Listening Ability, Social Participation and Adaptive Strategies to Challenges in the Real World

Charlotte Barbier, Melanie Ferguson, Paola Incerti, Joaquin T. Valderrama et al.
Audiology Research
Hearing Impairment and Communication
article

Unilateral Hearing Loss: Listening Ability, Social Participation and Adaptive Strategies to Challenges in the Real World

Charlotte Barbier, Melanie Ferguson, Paola Incerti, Joaquin T. Valderrama, Jorge Mejia
article en

Abstract

Background: Unilateral hearing loss (UHL) is associated with speech-in-noise difficulties, impaired spatial hearing, and reduced social participation, yet conventional audiological assessments may not capture these real-world consequences. This study characterised the multidimensional functional impact of UHL using an ecologically oriented test battery and explored whether accessible behavioural and self-reported measures accounted for individual differences in speech-in-noise comprehension. Methods: Fifteen adults with moderate to profound sensorineural UHL and sixteen adults with normal hearing completed standardised questionnaires assessing hearing disability and social participation, an auditory reaction-time task in quiet and noise, the National Acoustic Laboratories Dynamic Conversations Test, head-orientation tracking, and post-task self-reports. Group differences were assessed using mixed-effects models and independent-samples t-tests. An exploratory regression examined speech-in-noise performance within the UHL group. Results: Participants with UHL reported greater hearing difficulties and social participation restrictions, and showed modestly poorer speech-in-noise comprehension although the UHL–NH difference in speech-in-noise comprehension was no longer statistically significant after adjustment for age. Reaction times were significantly longer in noise than in quiet but did not differ significantly between hearing groups. The UHL group also showed a significantly more pronounced head orientation towards the poorer-hearing side and greater within-participant head-orientation variability. An exploratory model combining reaction time in noise with three post-task self-report items showed strong apparent in-sample fit (adjusted R2 = 0.71). However, internal cross-validation of the complete model-selection procedure yielded substantially lower predictive performance (RCV2 = 0.19). Conclusions: UHL is associated with differences across complementary perceptual, behavioural, and self-reported dimensions of everyday communication. Multimodal functional assessment may provide information beyond conventional audiometry, although the exploratory model requires validation in larger, age-matched independent cohorts.

Audiology ResearchVol. 16(5)
Curtin University (AU), National Acoustic Laboratories (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
British Society of Audiology, Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Australian Government, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Agencia Estatal de Investigación, European Social Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Hearing Impairment and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.