Hemorrhagic pericardial effusion 6 months following atrial septal defect device closure: Has it eroded?

Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect (ASD) is the preferred modality of treatment. Pericardial effusion occurring late after ASD device closure is extremely rare, and device-related erosion is the most likely possibility. We describe a 41-year-old male who underwent ASD device closure with a 32-mm Amplatzer Septal Occluder device and who developed cardiac tamponade 6 months after the procedure. Extensive investigations did not reveal any evidence of erosion. Given the endemicity of tuberculosis in India, exudative pericardial effusion, a positive tuberculin skin test, and the presence of a few matted mediastinal lymph nodes, the patient was started on antitubercular therapy. There was no reaccumulation of pericardial fluid at subsequent follow-ups. To conclude, not all hemorrhagic pericardial effusions following device closure of ASD are secondary to erosions. After ruling out device erosion, other etiologies for pericardial effusion should be carefully searched for.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Pediatric Cardiology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/apc.apc_216_24
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hemorrhagic pericardial effusion 6 months following atrial septal defect device closure: Has it eroded?

Sivasubramanian Ramakrishnan, Damandeep Singh, Chetan Patel, Shivam Goel et al.
3 citations
Annals of Pediatric Cardiology
Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
4.56
article

Hemorrhagic pericardial effusion 6 months following atrial septal defect device closure: Has it eroded?

Sivasubramanian Ramakrishnan, Damandeep Singh, Chetan Patel, Shivam Goel, Lamk Kadiyani, Alaina Zameer
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect (ASD) is the preferred modality of treatment. Pericardial effusion occurring late after ASD device closure is extremely rare, and device-related erosion is the most likely possibility. We describe a 41-year-old male who underwent ASD device closure with a 32-mm Amplatzer Septal Occluder device and who developed cardiac tamponade 6 months after the procedure. Extensive investigations did not reveal any evidence of erosion. Given the endemicity of tuberculosis in India, exudative pericardial effusion, a positive tuberculin skin test, and the presence of a few matted mediastinal lymph nodes, the patient was started on antitubercular therapy. There was no reaccumulation of pericardial fluid at subsequent follow-ups. To conclude, not all hemorrhagic pericardial effusions following device closure of ASD are secondary to erosions. After ruling out device erosion, other etiologies for pericardial effusion should be carefully searched for.

Annals of Pediatric CardiologyVol. 18(1)
All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
4.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.