Spatiotemporal prediction of soil organic carbon density in Europe (2000–2022) using earth observation and machine learning

This article describes a comprehensive framework for soil organic carbon density (SOCD, kg/m<sup>3</sup>) modeling and mapping, based on spatiotemporal random forest (RF) and quantile regression forests (QRF). A total of 45,616 SOCD observations and various Earth observation (EO) feature layers were used to produce 30 m SOCD maps for the EU at four-year intervals (2000-2022) and four soil depth intervals (0-20 cm, 20-50 cm, 50-100 cm, and 100-200 cm). Per-pixel 95% probability prediction intervals (PIs) and extrapolation risk probabilities are also provided. Model evaluation indicates good overall accuracy (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.63 and CCC = 0.76 for hold-out independent tests). Prediction accuracy varies by land cover, depth interval and year of prediction with the worst accuracy for shrubland and deeper soils 100-200 cm. The PI validation confirmed effective uncertainty estimation, though with reduced accuracy for higher SOCD values. Shapley analysis identified soil depth as the most influential feature, followed by vegetation, long-term bioclimate, and topographic features. While pixel-level uncertainty is substantial, spatial aggregation reduces uncertainty by approximately 66%. Detecting SOCD changes remains challenging but offers a baseline for future improvements. Maps, based primarily on topsoil data from cropland, grassland, and woodland, are best suited for applications related to these land covers and depths. We recommend that users interpret the maps in conjunction with local knowledge and consider the accompanying uncertainty and extrapolation risk layers. All data and code are available under an open license at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13754343 and https://github.com/AI4SoilHealth/SoilHealthDataCube/.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.19605
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatiotemporal prediction of soil organic carbon density in Europe (2000–2022) using earth observation and machine learning

Sytze de Bruin, Yu-Feng Ho, Robert Minařík, Murat Şahin et al.
6 citations
PeerJ
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
4.79
article

Spatiotemporal prediction of soil organic carbon density in Europe (2000–2022) using earth observation and machine learning

Sytze de Bruin, Yu-Feng Ho, Robert Minařík, Murat Şahin, Mustafa Serkan Ișık, Martin Herold, Davide Consoli, Rolf Simões, Xuemeng Tian, Tomislav Hengl
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This article describes a comprehensive framework for soil organic carbon density (SOCD, kg/m<sup>3</sup>) modeling and mapping, based on spatiotemporal random forest (RF) and quantile regression forests (QRF). A total of 45,616 SOCD observations and various Earth observation (EO) feature layers were used to produce 30 m SOCD maps for the EU at four-year intervals (2000-2022) and four soil depth intervals (0-20 cm, 20-50 cm, 50-100 cm, and 100-200 cm). Per-pixel 95% probability prediction intervals (PIs) and extrapolation risk probabilities are also provided. Model evaluation indicates good overall accuracy (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.63 and CCC = 0.76 for hold-out independent tests). Prediction accuracy varies by land cover, depth interval and year of prediction with the worst accuracy for shrubland and deeper soils 100-200 cm. The PI validation confirmed effective uncertainty estimation, though with reduced accuracy for higher SOCD values. Shapley analysis identified soil depth as the most influential feature, followed by vegetation, long-term bioclimate, and topographic features. While pixel-level uncertainty is substantial, spatial aggregation reduces uncertainty by approximately 66%. Detecting SOCD changes remains challenging but offers a baseline for future improvements. Maps, based primarily on topsoil data from cropland, grassland, and woodland, are best suited for applications related to these land covers and depths. We recommend that users interpret the maps in conjunction with local knowledge and consider the accompanying uncertainty and extrapolation risk layers. All data and code are available under an open license at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13754343 and https://github.com/AI4SoilHealth/SoilHealthDataCube/.

PeerJVol. 13
GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE), Open University of the Netherlands (NL), Wageningen University & Research (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
4.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.