Certain actions prohibition as unique and universal measure of procedural coercion in Russian criminal proceedings

The article identifies certain actions prohibition as a universal measure of criminal coercion, analyzes its specifics, unique characteristics, and advantages over other measures of coercion. Authors suggest considering the prohibition of certain actions in criminal proceedings as an independent measure of restraint, a necessary component of house arrest, a way to ensure bail and property arrest, and, in general, as an element of the criminal process’s proper and effective functioning. The emphasis is on the humanistic focus and variability of prohibitions and the technological aspects of monitoring compliance. This analysis identifies problems from insufficiently regulated control mechanisms for monitoring compliance with established prohibitions, and it proposes solutions via legislative improvements and technological modernization of the control system. The authors used theoretical and empirical methods of research: analysis of scientists’ views on the procedural nature of certain actions prohibition; comparison of statistical data on the use of preventive measures by years; survey of law enforcers.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Surgut State University Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35266/2949-3455-2025-2-9
Primary Topic
Education, Law, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Certain actions prohibition as unique and universal measure of procedural coercion in Russian criminal proceedings

Н. Н. Гребнева, A. V. Maksimovskikh
Surgut State University Journal
Education, Law, and Society
article

Certain actions prohibition as unique and universal measure of procedural coercion in Russian criminal proceedings

Н. Н. Гребнева, A. V. Maksimovskikh
article en

Abstract

The article identifies certain actions prohibition as a universal measure of criminal coercion, analyzes its specifics, unique characteristics, and advantages over other measures of coercion. Authors suggest considering the prohibition of certain actions in criminal proceedings as an independent measure of restraint, a necessary component of house arrest, a way to ensure bail and property arrest, and, in general, as an element of the criminal process’s proper and effective functioning. The emphasis is on the humanistic focus and variability of prohibitions and the technological aspects of monitoring compliance. This analysis identifies problems from insufficiently regulated control mechanisms for monitoring compliance with established prohibitions, and it proposes solutions via legislative improvements and technological modernization of the control system. The authors used theoretical and empirical methods of research: analysis of scientists’ views on the procedural nature of certain actions prohibition; comparison of statistical data on the use of preventive measures by years; survey of law enforcers.

Surgut State University JournalVol. 13(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Education, Law, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Certain actions prohibition as unique and universal measure of procedural coercion in Russian criminal proceedings — Н. Н. Гребнева, A. V. Maksimovskikh · Surgut State University Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS