Locating and Enumerating Anycast: a Comparison of Two Approaches

Anycast allows for providing services from multiple, geographically distant Points of Presence (PoPs), using a single IP address, to, e.g., improve resilience. Due to its opaqueness, it is often unknown which addresses are provisioned using anycast and, if so, where the PoPs are located. As anycast is widely used for critical Internet infrastructures (e.g., the DNS) efforts have been made to map anycast deployments. The current state-of-the-art mapping technique, iGreedy, relies on latency-based measurements, and is adversely affected by noise caused by, e.g., network processing delays. Previous work has shown that traceroute can alternatively be used to detect anycast. As traceroute reveals the hops a packet traverses, it may also be used to locate sites using geolocation data for hops near the anycast PoPs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3744200.3744783
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Locating and Enumerating Anycast: a Comparison of Two Approaches

Raffaele Sommese, Ben Du, Mattijs Jonker, Remi Hendriks et al.
1 citations
Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies
1.49
article

Locating and Enumerating Anycast: a Comparison of Two Approaches

Raffaele Sommese, Ben Du, Mattijs Jonker, Remi Hendriks, Roland van Rijswijk-Deij, Tim Betzer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Anycast allows for providing services from multiple, geographically distant Points of Presence (PoPs), using a single IP address, to, e.g., improve resilience. Due to its opaqueness, it is often unknown which addresses are provisioned using anycast and, if so, where the PoPs are located. As anycast is widely used for critical Internet infrastructures (e.g., the DNS) efforts have been made to map anycast deployments. The current state-of-the-art mapping technique, iGreedy, relies on latency-based measurements, and is adversely affected by noise caused by, e.g., network processing delays. Previous work has shown that traceroute can alternatively be used to detect anycast. As traceroute reveals the hops a packet traverses, it may also be used to locate sites using geolocation data for hops near the anycast PoPs.

University of California San Diego (US), Technical University of Munich (DE), University of Twente (NL)
National Science Foundation, University of Twente, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies
1.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Locating and Enumerating Anycast: a Comparison of Two Approaches — Raffaele Sommese, Ben Du, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS