Ineffectiveness of the “consistent with” judicial limitation on forensic firearm identification testimony.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law and Human Behavior
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000615
Primary Topic
Gun Ownership and Violence Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ineffectiveness of the “consistent with” judicial limitation on forensic firearm identification testimony.

Brandon L. Garrett, Nicholas Scurich, David L. Faigman
Law and Human Behavior
Gun Ownership and Violence Research
article

Ineffectiveness of the “consistent with” judicial limitation on forensic firearm identification testimony.

Brandon L. Garrett, Nicholas Scurich, David L. Faigman
article en

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
Law and Human BehaviorVol. 49(4)
Duke University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of California, Irvine (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Gun Ownership and Violence Research
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ineffectiveness of the “consistent with” judicial limitation on forensic firearm identification testimony. — Brandon L. Garrett, Nicholas Scurich, et al. · Law and Human Behavior (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS