Sensory and motor contents are prioritized dynamically in working memory

Internal selective attention prioritizes both sensory and motor contents in working memory to guide prospective behavior. Prior research has shown how attention modulation of sensory contents is flexible and temporally tuned depending on access requirements, but whether the prioritization of motor contents follows similar flexible dynamics remains elusive. Also uncharted is the degree of co-dependence of sensory and motor modulation, which gets at the nature of both working-memory representations and internal attention functions. To address these questions, we independently tracked the prioritization of sensory and motor working-memory contents as a function of dynamically evolving temporal expectations in human participants. The design orthogonally manipulated when an item location (left versus right side) and associated prospective action (left versus right hand) would be relevant. Contralateral-vs-ipsilateral modulation of posterior alpha (8-12 Hz) activity in electroencephalography (EEG) tracked prioritization of the item location, while contralateral-vs-ipsilateral modulation of central mu/beta (8-30 Hz) activity tracked response prioritization. Proactive and dynamic alpha and mu/beta modulation confirmed the flexible and temporally structured prioritization of sensory and motor contents alike. Intriguingly, the prioritization of sensory and motor contents was temporally uncoupled, showing dissociable patterns of modulation. The findings reveal multiple modulatory functions of internal attention operating in tandem to prepare relevant aspects of internal representations for adaptive behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS Biology
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003273
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensory and motor contents are prioritized dynamically in working memory

Freek van Ede, Irene Echeverria-Altuna, Sage Boettcher, Anna Christina Nobre
1 citations
PLoS Biology
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
1.43
article

Sensory and motor contents are prioritized dynamically in working memory

Freek van Ede, Irene Echeverria-Altuna, Sage Boettcher, Anna Christina Nobre
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Internal selective attention prioritizes both sensory and motor contents in working memory to guide prospective behavior. Prior research has shown how attention modulation of sensory contents is flexible and temporally tuned depending on access requirements, but whether the prioritization of motor contents follows similar flexible dynamics remains elusive. Also uncharted is the degree of co-dependence of sensory and motor modulation, which gets at the nature of both working-memory representations and internal attention functions. To address these questions, we independently tracked the prioritization of sensory and motor working-memory contents as a function of dynamically evolving temporal expectations in human participants. The design orthogonally manipulated when an item location (left versus right side) and associated prospective action (left versus right hand) would be relevant. Contralateral-vs-ipsilateral modulation of posterior alpha (8-12 Hz) activity in electroencephalography (EEG) tracked prioritization of the item location, while contralateral-vs-ipsilateral modulation of central mu/beta (8-30 Hz) activity tracked response prioritization. Proactive and dynamic alpha and mu/beta modulation confirmed the flexible and temporally structured prioritization of sensory and motor contents alike. Intriguingly, the prioritization of sensory and motor contents was temporally uncoupled, showing dissociable patterns of modulation. The findings reveal multiple modulatory functions of internal attention operating in tandem to prepare relevant aspects of internal representations for adaptive behavior.

PLoS BiologyVol. 23(7)
Yale University (US), University of Oxford (GB), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
James S. McDonnell Foundation, Wellcome Trust, HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.