Comparative Analysis of MPPT Based on PSO, SSA and ISSA Algorithms under Partial Shade Conditions

Maximum power point tracking (MPPT) technology is the core means to improve the efficiency of photovoltaic power generation system. However, under the shadow condition, the existence of local maximum power points may make it difficult for traditional MPPT algorithm to accurately find the global maximum power point (GMPP). In order to solve this problem, this paper studies and compares the applications of particle swarm optimization (PSO), Sparrow Search algorithm (SSA) and Improved Sparrow search algorithm (ISSA) in MPPT. In this paper, the principles and processes of three artificial intelligence algorithms are described in detail, and their performance under static shadow occlusion and shadow mutation is analyzed by building simulation models in Matlab/Simulink. The results show that the three algorithms can effectively track the maximum power point of photovoltaic arrays, among which the particle swarm optimization algorithm has the highest tracking accuracy, the improved sparrow search algorithm has the fastest convergence speed, while the sparrow search algorithm has relatively low tracking accuracy and the slowest convergence speed. This study provides an important reference for MPPT optimization of photovoltaic systems in complex environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icpies65420.2025.11070206
Primary Topic
Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of MPPT Based on PSO, SSA and ISSA Algorithms under Partial Shade Conditions

Feng Yun Yan, Bingtao Zhou, Xue Jia, Yuxin Zhang et al.
Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
article

Comparative Analysis of MPPT Based on PSO, SSA and ISSA Algorithms under Partial Shade Conditions

Feng Yun Yan, Bingtao Zhou, Xue Jia, Yuxin Zhang, Liqun Liu, Shaojuan Yu
article en

Abstract

Maximum power point tracking (MPPT) technology is the core means to improve the efficiency of photovoltaic power generation system. However, under the shadow condition, the existence of local maximum power points may make it difficult for traditional MPPT algorithm to accurately find the global maximum power point (GMPP). In order to solve this problem, this paper studies and compares the applications of particle swarm optimization (PSO), Sparrow Search algorithm (SSA) and Improved Sparrow search algorithm (ISSA) in MPPT. In this paper, the principles and processes of three artificial intelligence algorithms are described in detail, and their performance under static shadow occlusion and shadow mutation is analyzed by building simulation models in Matlab/Simulink. The results show that the three algorithms can effectively track the maximum power point of photovoltaic arrays, among which the particle swarm optimization algorithm has the highest tracking accuracy, the improved sparrow search algorithm has the fastest convergence speed, while the sparrow search algorithm has relatively low tracking accuracy and the slowest convergence speed. This study provides an important reference for MPPT optimization of photovoltaic systems in complex environments.

Taiyuan University of Science and Technology (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of MPPT Based on PSO, SSA and ISSA Algorithms under Partial Shade Conditions — Feng Yun Yan, Bingtao Zhou, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS