Assessing Science Robustness in Uncertain Environments: Application to a Uranus Flagship Mission

Defining science objectives for missions to unexplored bodies can be difficult when the underlying processes and mechanisms are not well understood. This uncertainty presents a challenge when attempting to determine mission requirements to address these objectives. Additionally, uncertainties in the environment may present risks to the system and mission operations. To this end, uncertainty quantification is increasingly used to inform and validate mission design. However, a framework has yet to be developed to support trajectory tradespace exploration of missions targeting uncertain environments through science modeling. The proposed methodology develops a science systems engineering framework integrating a science representation with trajectory designs to compute quantitative science value metrics. The science model is established by identifying relevant physical models (such as governing equations and assumptions) and input variables from the literature, simulation data, as well as past mission results. Variables are defined with probability distributions, and Monte Carlo simulations are used to quantify the uncertainties. For a given trajectory, the analysis outputs predictive probability distributions of the science value metrics, highlighting the trajectory's science performance and its robustness to uncertainty in the physical processes. The framework is applicable to any mission targeting highly dynamic and uncertain processes. This paper demonstrates its application to a future Uranus Flagship mission, focusing on magnetosphere science objectives. Listed as the highest priority Flagship mission by the latest Decadal Survey, a mission to the Uranian system aims to answer science questions regarding Uranus's interior and atmosphere, its satellites and rings, and its magnetosphere. Analytic and numerical models have been developed to understand Uranus' magnetosphere; however, significant uncertainties remain, leading to challenges when defining magnetosphere science investigations. By applying the proposed methodology, this paper shows a significant variation in predicted science metrics of interest (e.g., number of magnetopause crossings) that can be expected from similar trajectories due to varying environment conditions (solar wind and interplanetary magnetic field) or different arrival times at Uranus. These results should inform the flow-down of measurement requirements to mission design requirements for magnetosphere science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/aero63441.2025.11068441
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Technology Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Science Robustness in Uncertain Environments: Application to a Uranus Flagship Mission

Chloe Gentgen, Olivier de Weck, Damon Landau, J. M. Jasinski et al.
1 citations
Technology Assessment and Management
1.30
article

Assessing Science Robustness in Uncertain Environments: Application to a Uranus Flagship Mission

Chloe Gentgen, Olivier de Weck, Damon Landau, J. M. Jasinski, Benjamin P. Weiss
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Defining science objectives for missions to unexplored bodies can be difficult when the underlying processes and mechanisms are not well understood. This uncertainty presents a challenge when attempting to determine mission requirements to address these objectives. Additionally, uncertainties in the environment may present risks to the system and mission operations. To this end, uncertainty quantification is increasingly used to inform and validate mission design. However, a framework has yet to be developed to support trajectory tradespace exploration of missions targeting uncertain environments through science modeling. The proposed methodology develops a science systems engineering framework integrating a science representation with trajectory designs to compute quantitative science value metrics. The science model is established by identifying relevant physical models (such as governing equations and assumptions) and input variables from the literature, simulation data, as well as past mission results. Variables are defined with probability distributions, and Monte Carlo simulations are used to quantify the uncertainties. For a given trajectory, the analysis outputs predictive probability distributions of the science value metrics, highlighting the trajectory's science performance and its robustness to uncertainty in the physical processes. The framework is applicable to any mission targeting highly dynamic and uncertain processes. This paper demonstrates its application to a future Uranus Flagship mission, focusing on magnetosphere science objectives. Listed as the highest priority Flagship mission by the latest Decadal Survey, a mission to the Uranian system aims to answer science questions regarding Uranus's interior and atmosphere, its satellites and rings, and its magnetosphere. Analytic and numerical models have been developed to understand Uranus' magnetosphere; however, significant uncertainties remain, leading to challenges when defining magnetosphere science investigations. By applying the proposed methodology, this paper shows a significant variation in predicted science metrics of interest (e.g., number of magnetopause crossings) that can be expected from similar trajectories due to varying environment conditions (solar wind and interplanetary magnetic field) or different arrival times at Uranus. These results should inform the flow-down of measurement requirements to mission design requirements for magnetosphere science.

Planetary Science Institute (US), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US), American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Technology Assessment and Management
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.