Comparative Analysis of Power and Delay Efficient Dynamic Logic Techniques Under Process Variations

With the continuous scaling of transistor technology, power consumption and propagation delay have become critical concerns in modern Very Large Scale Integration design. This paper presents a comparative analysis of various power and delay efficient dynamic logic techniques, including conventional Domino logic, foot-driven stack transistor logic (FDSTL), footer voltage controlled dual keeper Domino logic (FVCDKDL), clock delayed dual keeper Domino logic (CDDK), low leakage clock keeper Domino logic (LLCKDL), and LECTOR-based FDSTL. The study evaluates these techniques under different process corners—Typical-Typical (TT), Fast-Fast (FF), Slow-Slow (SS), Fast-Slow (FS), and Slow-Fast (SF)—to assess their robustness against fabrication-induced variations. Simulation results show that while FVCDKDL and LLCKDL reduce power consumption by over 99% compared to Domino logic, techniques such as CDDK and Domino logic exhibit failures under extreme process conditions. FVCDKDL achieves the lowest power consumption, with a reduction exceeding 99.3% in the FF corner, whereas LECTOR FDSTL consumes up to 83% lower power than Domino logic in the FS corner. Delay analysis further highlights that FVCDKDL provides up to 10% lower propagation delay across all corners, while LECTOR FDSTL exhibits severe performance degradation, experiencing a high delay rise. These findings underscore the importance of selecting robust circuit techniques that ensure efficiency across varying fabrication conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/vlsisata65374.2025.11070042
Primary Topic
Low-power high-performance VLSI design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Power and Delay Efficient Dynamic Logic Techniques Under Process Variations

Sreekala K.S., Giya Mary George
Low-power high-performance VLSI design
article

Comparative Analysis of Power and Delay Efficient Dynamic Logic Techniques Under Process Variations

Sreekala K.S., Giya Mary George
article en

Abstract

With the continuous scaling of transistor technology, power consumption and propagation delay have become critical concerns in modern Very Large Scale Integration design. This paper presents a comparative analysis of various power and delay efficient dynamic logic techniques, including conventional Domino logic, foot-driven stack transistor logic (FDSTL), footer voltage controlled dual keeper Domino logic (FVCDKDL), clock delayed dual keeper Domino logic (CDDK), low leakage clock keeper Domino logic (LLCKDL), and LECTOR-based FDSTL. The study evaluates these techniques under different process corners—Typical-Typical (TT), Fast-Fast (FF), Slow-Slow (SS), Fast-Slow (FS), and Slow-Fast (SF)—to assess their robustness against fabrication-induced variations. Simulation results show that while FVCDKDL and LLCKDL reduce power consumption by over 99% compared to Domino logic, techniques such as CDDK and Domino logic exhibit failures under extreme process conditions. FVCDKDL achieves the lowest power consumption, with a reduction exceeding 99.3% in the FF corner, whereas LECTOR FDSTL consumes up to 83% lower power than Domino logic in the FS corner. Delay analysis further highlights that FVCDKDL provides up to 10% lower propagation delay across all corners, while LECTOR FDSTL exhibits severe performance degradation, experiencing a high delay rise. These findings underscore the importance of selecting robust circuit techniques that ensure efficiency across varying fabrication conditions.

Government Medical College (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Low-power high-performance VLSI design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.