Enhanced Signature Recognition and Fraud Detection with Deep Learning

Signature forgery undermines trust in financial, legal, and identity verification systems, costing industries billions annually. This review critically evaluates the efficacy of deep learning techniques—Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Transfer Learning, and Hybrid Models—in detecting fraudulent signatures. By synthesizing findings from 40+ studies, we demonstrate that CNN-based methods achieve up to 92.3% accuracy by extracting spatial features like stroke curvature and pen pressure, while hybrid frameworks combining CNNs with attention mechanisms improve robustness against noise by 12%. However, challenges such as computational inefficiency, dataset bias, and poor interpretability hinder real-world adoption. We advocate for lightweight architectures (e.g., MobileNetV3) and explainable AI techniques to bridge this gap. This work not only maps the evolution of automated signature verification but also provides actionable insights for developing secure, scalable solutions tailored to dynamic fraud landscapes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icetecc65365.2025.11070295
Primary Topic
Digital Media Forensic Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhanced Signature Recognition and Fraud Detection with Deep Learning

Syed Irtiza Ali Shah, Muhammad Waleed Khan, Zartasha Mustansar, Shahanaz Ayub
Digital Media Forensic Detection
article

Enhanced Signature Recognition and Fraud Detection with Deep Learning

Syed Irtiza Ali Shah, Muhammad Waleed Khan, Zartasha Mustansar, Shahanaz Ayub
article en

Abstract

Signature forgery undermines trust in financial, legal, and identity verification systems, costing industries billions annually. This review critically evaluates the efficacy of deep learning techniques—Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Transfer Learning, and Hybrid Models—in detecting fraudulent signatures. By synthesizing findings from 40+ studies, we demonstrate that CNN-based methods achieve up to 92.3% accuracy by extracting spatial features like stroke curvature and pen pressure, while hybrid frameworks combining CNNs with attention mechanisms improve robustness against noise by 12%. However, challenges such as computational inefficiency, dataset bias, and poor interpretability hinder real-world adoption. We advocate for lightweight architectures (e.g., MobileNetV3) and explainable AI techniques to bridge this gap. This work not only maps the evolution of automated signature verification but also provides actionable insights for developing secure, scalable solutions tailored to dynamic fraud landscapes.

National University of Sciences and Technology (PK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Digital Media Forensic Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Enhanced Signature Recognition and Fraud Detection with Deep Learning — Syed Irtiza Ali Shah, Muhammad Waleed Khan, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS