Study on the Performance of the STMAS-WRF Model in Short-term Forecasting of Wind Field in Hangzhou Bay, Zhejiang Province

To evaluate the forecasting performance of the wind speed prediction product based on the STMAS-WRF model along the coastal region of Hangzhou Bay, this study utilizes wind speed observation data at $\mathbf{1 0 0}$-meter turbine heights from the Jiaxing and Shengsi wind farms between February and November 2024. The results indicate that: (1) The STMAS-WRF wind speed forecast product performs well for the Jiaxing and Shengsi wind farms, with forecast results closely aligned with wind speed trends. The correlation coefficients for Days 1 to 3 are $0.59,0.55$, and 0.52, respectively, while the root mean square errors (RMSEs) are $2.94 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}, 3.13 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}$, and $3.21 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}$. As the forecast lead time increases, the correlation decreases, and the RMSE increases. (2) Wind speed forecast errors exhibit a diurnal variation, with the smallest errors occurring in the early morning and the largest at midday. Overall, the forecasted wind speed tends to be higher than observed values. (3) Regarding wind speed ranges, the forecasts for Days $\mathbf{0}-\mathbf{3}$ effectively capture wind speed variations in the $3-12 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}$ range, but the accuracy for predicting high winds (above $12 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}$) is relatively lower. In general, the STMAS-WRF model demonstrates good forecasting performance, with error patterns showing regularity. This provides a basis for further calibration of the product to reduce error levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icpies65420.2025.11070089
Primary Topic
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study on the Performance of the STMAS-WRF Model in Short-term Forecasting of Wind Field in Hangzhou Bay, Zhejiang Province

Shuxin Cai, Jiyong Yao, Chao Ren, Yanan Wang et al.
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
article

Study on the Performance of the STMAS-WRF Model in Short-term Forecasting of Wind Field in Hangzhou Bay, Zhejiang Province

Shuxin Cai, Jiyong Yao, Chao Ren, Yanan Wang, Yaying Pan, Luan Xu
article en

Abstract

To evaluate the forecasting performance of the wind speed prediction product based on the STMAS-WRF model along the coastal region of Hangzhou Bay, this study utilizes wind speed observation data at $\mathbf{1 0 0}$-meter turbine heights from the Jiaxing and Shengsi wind farms between February and November 2024. The results indicate that: (1) The STMAS-WRF wind speed forecast product performs well for the Jiaxing and Shengsi wind farms, with forecast results closely aligned with wind speed trends. The correlation coefficients for Days 1 to 3 are $0.59,0.55$, and 0.52, respectively, while the root mean square errors (RMSEs) are $2.94 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}, 3.13 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}$, and $3.21 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}$. As the forecast lead time increases, the correlation decreases, and the RMSE increases. (2) Wind speed forecast errors exhibit a diurnal variation, with the smallest errors occurring in the early morning and the largest at midday. Overall, the forecasted wind speed tends to be higher than observed values. (3) Regarding wind speed ranges, the forecasts for Days $\mathbf{0}-\mathbf{3}$ effectively capture wind speed variations in the $3-12 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}$ range, but the accuracy for predicting high winds (above $12 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}$) is relatively lower. In general, the STMAS-WRF model demonstrates good forecasting performance, with error patterns showing regularity. This provides a basis for further calibration of the product to reduce error levels.

Zhejiang Meteorological Bureau (CN)
China Meteorological Administration
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.