Exoscopic-assisted head and neck surgery: a comparative evaluation optimizing ergonomics and workflow

Exoscopic surgery is an emerging visualization technique in head and neck surgery, offering a promising alternative to conventional surgical microscopes. AI-assisted functions and high-quality imaging support its integration into modern surgical workflows. Eleven head and neck procedures were evaluated, including otologic surgery, parotidectomy and microvascular anastomosis using exoscopic techniques. Subjective feedback was obtained from four primary surgeons and four surgical assistants (response rate 100%) via a custom, non-validated questionnaire comprising 18 items. Six questions compared exoscope versus standard magnification (microscope or surgical loupes) across domains including anatomical structure identification, depth perception, field illumination and magnification, preoperative setup handling, and overall preference. Twelve questions addressed ergonomic comfort, 3D glasses and head-mounted display (HMDmd) wearability, and intraoperative handling. Ergonomic strain was assessed using the validated Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA). Exoscopic systems demonstrated advantages, such as superior 4K-3D imaging, enhanced depth perception, improved ergonomics and facilitated intraoperative collaboration and education. RULA scores indicated reduced musculoskeletal strain, especially during longer procedures. Mean setup time was 4:14 min (range: 4:05-4:45 min), including draping (mean 2:04 min; range: 1:50-2:30 min). Surgeons described a brief adaptation period, primarily related to foot pedal control and digital interface navigation. AI-assisted features, including Auto-Center and Voice Control, further optimized workflow. Exoscopic surgery offers benefits for head and neck procedures requiring sustained magnification and precision. Short training times and ongoing technological advancements, such as improved working distances, head-mounted displays, and cost efficiency, are expected to further enhance its clinical value.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Robotic Surgery
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02551-7
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exoscopic-assisted head and neck surgery: a comparative evaluation optimizing ergonomics and workflow

Julia Lingl, Júlia María D’Andréa Greve, Eva Goldberg‐Bockhorn, Till Hoffmann et al.
2 citations
Journal of Robotic Surgery
Surgical Simulation and Training
4.01
article

Exoscopic-assisted head and neck surgery: a comparative evaluation optimizing ergonomics and workflow

Julia Lingl, Júlia María D’Andréa Greve, Eva Goldberg‐Bockhorn, Till Hoffmann, Felix Boehm
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Exoscopic surgery is an emerging visualization technique in head and neck surgery, offering a promising alternative to conventional surgical microscopes. AI-assisted functions and high-quality imaging support its integration into modern surgical workflows. Eleven head and neck procedures were evaluated, including otologic surgery, parotidectomy and microvascular anastomosis using exoscopic techniques. Subjective feedback was obtained from four primary surgeons and four surgical assistants (response rate 100%) via a custom, non-validated questionnaire comprising 18 items. Six questions compared exoscope versus standard magnification (microscope or surgical loupes) across domains including anatomical structure identification, depth perception, field illumination and magnification, preoperative setup handling, and overall preference. Twelve questions addressed ergonomic comfort, 3D glasses and head-mounted display (HMDmd) wearability, and intraoperative handling. Ergonomic strain was assessed using the validated Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA). Exoscopic systems demonstrated advantages, such as superior 4K-3D imaging, enhanced depth perception, improved ergonomics and facilitated intraoperative collaboration and education. RULA scores indicated reduced musculoskeletal strain, especially during longer procedures. Mean setup time was 4:14 min (range: 4:05-4:45 min), including draping (mean 2:04 min; range: 1:50-2:30 min). Surgeons described a brief adaptation period, primarily related to foot pedal control and digital interface navigation. AI-assisted features, including Auto-Center and Voice Control, further optimized workflow. Exoscopic surgery offers benefits for head and neck procedures requiring sustained magnification and precision. Short training times and ongoing technological advancements, such as improved working distances, head-mounted displays, and cost efficiency, are expected to further enhance its clinical value.

Journal of Robotic SurgeryVol. 19(1)
Universität Ulm (DE), University Hospital Ulm (DE)
Carl Zeiss Meditec AG
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Surgical Simulation and Training
4.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.