Weighted Riemann Zeta Function Limits on the Real Axis

In the paper, it is investigated whether for real argument $$s$$ the $$(s-1)^{n+1}$$ weighted Riemann zeta function $$\zeta^{(n)}(s)$$ limits $$s\downarrow 1$$ do exist. Here we will look only at $$n=0,1$$ . The answer to the question could very well be that assuming existence of limits to be true gives a conflicting outcome. This result may support the possibility of what can be called incompleteness in concrete mathematics. Interestingly, the uncovered incompleteness occurs in an approximation-theoretical framework. The key argument we employ in the paper revolves around the approximation of a l’Hôpital limit. Only an ‘‘after the fact’’ alternative approach reorders the formulae in the derivation. This reordering is, in fact, based on a $$0=1$$ contradiction as starting point. However, the alternative $$0=1$$ based approach is not the limit approximation that is used in the flow of the derivation in the present paper.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s1995080224606258
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Analytic Number Theory Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weighted Riemann Zeta Function Limits on the Real Axis

J. F. Geurdes
1 citations
Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics
Analytic Number Theory Research
5.38
article

Weighted Riemann Zeta Function Limits on the Real Axis

J. F. Geurdes
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the paper, it is investigated whether for real argument $$s$$ the $$(s-1)^{n+1}$$ weighted Riemann zeta function $$\zeta^{(n)}(s)$$ limits $$s\downarrow 1$$ do exist. Here we will look only at $$n=0,1$$ . The answer to the question could very well be that assuming existence of limits to be true gives a conflicting outcome. This result may support the possibility of what can be called incompleteness in concrete mathematics. Interestingly, the uncovered incompleteness occurs in an approximation-theoretical framework. The key argument we employ in the paper revolves around the approximation of a l’Hôpital limit. Only an ‘‘after the fact’’ alternative approach reorders the formulae in the derivation. This reordering is, in fact, based on a $$0=1$$ contradiction as starting point. However, the alternative $$0=1$$ based approach is not the limit approximation that is used in the flow of the derivation in the present paper.

Lobachevskii Journal of MathematicsVol. 46(3)
Gemeente Den Haag (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Analytic Number Theory Research
5.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.