How Diverse Are Our Conference Review Boards?

The diversity of review boards is crucial in improving the overall review quality at academic venues. In this report, we examine the review board characteristics of four major data management conferences across four diversity dimensions and over time. Our analysis shows that smaller venues have made significant strides in diversifying their review boards, whereas larger venues encounter difficulties in achieving similar diversity due to overrepresentation in certain dimensions. We emphasize the importance of intensifying efforts to create more diverse and balanced review boards and advocate for the development of tools to support this process.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ACM SIGMOD Record
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3749116.3749135
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Diverse Are Our Conference Review Boards?

Sourav S. Bhowmick, Divesh Srivastava
ACM SIGMOD Record
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

How Diverse Are Our Conference Review Boards?

Sourav S. Bhowmick, Divesh Srivastava
article en

Abstract

The diversity of review boards is crucial in improving the overall review quality at academic venues. In this report, we examine the review board characteristics of four major data management conferences across four diversity dimensions and over time. Our analysis shows that smaller venues have made significant strides in diversifying their review boards, whereas larger venues encounter difficulties in achieving similar diversity due to overrepresentation in certain dimensions. We emphasize the importance of intensifying efforts to create more diverse and balanced review boards and advocate for the development of tools to support this process.

ACM SIGMOD RecordVol. 54(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.