<i>Review article</i> : Data, algorithms and the asymmetric politics of extraction

The last few years have seen the rollout of several generative AI applications. Yet, it is often claimed by commentators and social scientists that these have only been made possible through the extraction of people’s data without their consent. This review article will provide a critical overview of the notion of extraction. It explores how the term is being used in various scholarly fields in relation to discussions of data and algorithms whilst also seeking to do justice to the term’s heterogeneity. The review is structured around three different kinds of extraction: data, human labour, and material resources. It highlights places where the notion of extraction is being used, what it does and makes possible, what it opens up, and what it sensitises us to. By foregrounding the variegated impact of extractive practices and processes, the aim is to continue to lay bare the strategic amnesia on which digital capitalism and the AI industry depends and continues to thrive.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Sociological Review
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261251352378
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Review article : Data, algorithms and the asymmetric politics of extraction

Benjamin N. Jacobsen
2 citations
The Sociological Review
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
article

Review article : Data, algorithms and the asymmetric politics of extraction

Benjamin N. Jacobsen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The last few years have seen the rollout of several generative AI applications. Yet, it is often claimed by commentators and social scientists that these have only been made possible through the extraction of people’s data without their consent. This review article will provide a critical overview of the notion of extraction. It explores how the term is being used in various scholarly fields in relation to discussions of data and algorithms whilst also seeking to do justice to the term’s heterogeneity. The review is structured around three different kinds of extraction: data, human labour, and material resources. It highlights places where the notion of extraction is being used, what it does and makes possible, what it opens up, and what it sensitises us to. By foregrounding the variegated impact of extractive practices and processes, the aim is to continue to lay bare the strategic amnesia on which digital capitalism and the AI industry depends and continues to thrive.

The Sociological ReviewVol. 73(6)
University of York (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.