Academic Ethics in the Age of AI: A case study at STKIP DDI Pinrang

This study explores the extent of Artificial Intelligence (AI) usage among students and its implications for academic ethics, with a specific focus on STKIP DDI Pinrang. Employing a mixed-methods approach, quantitative data were collected through Likert-scale questionnaires distributed to 40 students, while qualitative insights were gathered via interviews with selected respondents. The findings indicate that students’ AI usage is very high (mean score: 4.45), particularly through tools such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, and Quillbot. However, their ethical awareness remains moderate, both in terms of understanding academic ethics (3.1562) and awareness of the ethical implications of AI use (3.04). Correlation analysis reveals a negative relationship between the intensity of AI usage and students' ethical perceptions. Thematic analysis of interviews confirms that students tend to use AI as a substitute rather than a support, and lack institutional guidance on its ethical boundaries. These findings highlight a critical gap between technological proficiency and ethical literacy. The study recommends integrating digital ethics education across curricula and establishing clear institutional policies to ensure responsible AI use in academic settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
APLIKATIF Journal of Research Trends in Social Sciences and Humanities
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59110/aplikatif.v4i3.667
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Legal and Policy Analysis in Indonesia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
31.97
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Academic Ethics in the Age of AI: A case study at STKIP DDI Pinrang

Nurhandayani Nurhandayani, Nurul Amalia Aris, Mawardi Jalil Masri, Sulaiman Sulaiman et al.
2 citations
APLIKATIF Journal of Research Trends in Social Sciences and Humanities
Legal and Policy Analysis in Indonesia
31.97
article

Academic Ethics in the Age of AI: A case study at STKIP DDI Pinrang

Nurhandayani Nurhandayani, Nurul Amalia Aris, Mawardi Jalil Masri, Sulaiman Sulaiman, Abdul Walid
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study explores the extent of Artificial Intelligence (AI) usage among students and its implications for academic ethics, with a specific focus on STKIP DDI Pinrang. Employing a mixed-methods approach, quantitative data were collected through Likert-scale questionnaires distributed to 40 students, while qualitative insights were gathered via interviews with selected respondents. The findings indicate that students’ AI usage is very high (mean score: 4.45), particularly through tools such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, and Quillbot. However, their ethical awareness remains moderate, both in terms of understanding academic ethics (3.1562) and awareness of the ethical implications of AI use (3.04). Correlation analysis reveals a negative relationship between the intensity of AI usage and students' ethical perceptions. Thematic analysis of interviews confirms that students tend to use AI as a substitute rather than a support, and lack institutional guidance on its ethical boundaries. These findings highlight a critical gap between technological proficiency and ethical literacy. The study recommends integrating digital ethics education across curricula and establishing clear institutional policies to ensure responsible AI use in academic settings.

APLIKATIF Journal of Research Trends in Social Sciences and HumanitiesVol. 4(3)
Cochrane (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Legal and Policy Analysis in Indonesia
31.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.