Metabolic demands and physical performance in football: a position-specific analysis of energy system utilization

Introduction: Football demands a balance of aerobic and anaerobic energy systems, varying by playing position. Midfielders rely on aerobic endurance for sustained movement, while strikers and wingers depend on anaerobic pathways for repeated sprints. Defenders and goalkeepers require anaerobic power for aerial duels and explosive actions. Understanding these demands is essential for optimizing training. Objective: This study analyzed the metabolic demands and physical performance of collegiate football players across positions, focusing on endurance, speed, vertical jump, and agility. Methodology: Forty collegiate football players (goalkeepers, defenders, midfielders, strikers) underwent field tests: the 12-Minute Cooper Test (endurance), 50-Meter Sprint Test (speed), Sargent Jump Test (anaerobic power), and Illinois Agility Test. One-way ANOVA and post hoc analysis assessed positional differences. Results: Significant differences (p < 0.001) were found. Midfielders had superior endurance (3306.6 ± 80.2 mt), strikers were fastest (6.43 ± 0.09 sec), goalkeepers had the highest vertical jump (64.6 ± 1.07 cm), and strikers displayed the best agility (14.28 ± 0.58 sec). Discussion: Results confirm distinct physiological profiles. Midfielders prioritize endurance, while strikers and defenders rely on anaerobic power and speed. Conclusion: Position-specific training is crucial for optimizing performance and reducing injury risk. Future research should integrate match-specific GPS and metabolic profiling for deeper insights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Retos
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v69.114722
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metabolic demands and physical performance in football: a position-specific analysis of energy system utilization

Anindita Das, Debajit Karmakar, Purnima Chetry, Sohom Saha et al.
1 citations
Retos
Sports Performance and Training
1.72
article

Metabolic demands and physical performance in football: a position-specific analysis of energy system utilization

Anindita Das, Debajit Karmakar, Purnima Chetry, Sohom Saha, Awesh Khati, Lata Apara Deori, Rintu Saibya, Jinnatunnesha Khatun
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Football demands a balance of aerobic and anaerobic energy systems, varying by playing position. Midfielders rely on aerobic endurance for sustained movement, while strikers and wingers depend on anaerobic pathways for repeated sprints. Defenders and goalkeepers require anaerobic power for aerial duels and explosive actions. Understanding these demands is essential for optimizing training. Objective: This study analyzed the metabolic demands and physical performance of collegiate football players across positions, focusing on endurance, speed, vertical jump, and agility. Methodology: Forty collegiate football players (goalkeepers, defenders, midfielders, strikers) underwent field tests: the 12-Minute Cooper Test (endurance), 50-Meter Sprint Test (speed), Sargent Jump Test (anaerobic power), and Illinois Agility Test. One-way ANOVA and post hoc analysis assessed positional differences. Results: Significant differences (p < 0.001) were found. Midfielders had superior endurance (3306.6 ± 80.2 mt), strikers were fastest (6.43 ± 0.09 sec), goalkeepers had the highest vertical jump (64.6 ± 1.07 cm), and strikers displayed the best agility (14.28 ± 0.58 sec). Discussion: Results confirm distinct physiological profiles. Midfielders prioritize endurance, while strikers and defenders rely on anaerobic power and speed. Conclusion: Position-specific training is crucial for optimizing performance and reducing injury risk. Future research should integrate match-specific GPS and metabolic profiling for deeper insights.

RetosVol. 69
Lakshmibai National Institute of Physical Education (IN), ITM University (IN), University of Kalyani (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Sports Performance and Training
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.