Equity in evidence synthesis

This research explored the impact of race and ethnicity on Black, Indigenous, and People Of Color (BIPOC) and their participation throughout the production of evidence synthesis in information science research. The study also analyzed the potential for evidence synthesis team reviewers to face pressure to modify their results based on their experiences and standing in their profession. A team of health sciences librarians and a full-time faculty member serving as director of a health sciences program at a university in the United States created a survey to better understand the possible effect of race and ethnicity on participation in evidence synthesis. The survey was sent to various online listservs and had quantitative and open-ended questions. There were 118 participants (n = 89 for white participants; n = 29 for BIPOC participants). There were significant associations between length in the profession and repercussions, repercussions and article evaluation career, not complementary and repercussions, not complementary and article evaluation and career, change score and article evaluation career, change score and repercussions, and change score and not complementary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Information Diversity & Inclusion (IJIDI)
Published
2025-05-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33137/ijidi.v9i1/2.43791
Primary Topic
Health Sciences Research and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Equity in evidence synthesis

Rachel Keiko Stark, Laura Gaeta
1 links
The International Journal of Information Diversity & Inclusion (IJIDI)
Health Sciences Research and Education
article

Equity in evidence synthesis

Rachel Keiko Stark, Laura Gaeta
article en

Abstract

This research explored the impact of race and ethnicity on Black, Indigenous, and People Of Color (BIPOC) and their participation throughout the production of evidence synthesis in information science research. The study also analyzed the potential for evidence synthesis team reviewers to face pressure to modify their results based on their experiences and standing in their profession. A team of health sciences librarians and a full-time faculty member serving as director of a health sciences program at a university in the United States created a survey to better understand the possible effect of race and ethnicity on participation in evidence synthesis. The survey was sent to various online listservs and had quantitative and open-ended questions. There were 118 participants (n = 89 for white participants; n = 29 for BIPOC participants). There were significant associations between length in the profession and repercussions, repercussions and article evaluation career, not complementary and repercussions, not complementary and article evaluation and career, change score and article evaluation career, change score and repercussions, and change score and not complementary.

The International Journal of Information Diversity & Inclusion (IJIDI)Vol. 9(1/2)
California State University, Sacramento (US)
University of Toronto
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Health Sciences Research and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Equity in evidence synthesis — Rachel Keiko Stark, Laura Gaeta · The International Journal of Information Diversity & Inclusion (IJIDI) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS