Mutation bias alters the distribution of fitness effects of mutations

Mutation bias is an important factor determining the diversity of genetic variants available for selection. As adaptation proceeds and some beneficial mutations are fixed, new beneficial mutations become rare, limiting further adaptation. The depletion of beneficial mutations is especially stark within the mutational class favored by the existing mutation bias. Recent theoretical work predicts that this problem may be alleviated by a change in the direction of mutation bias (i.e., a bias reversal). If populations sample previously underexplored types of mutations, the distribution of fitness effects (DFE) of mutations should shift towards more beneficial mutations. Here, we test this prediction using Escherichia coli, which has a transition mutation bias, with ~54% single-nucleotide mutations being transitions compared to the unbiased expectation of ~33% transitions. We generated mutant strains with a wide range of mutation biases, from 97% transitions to 98% transversions, either reinforcing or reversing the wild-type transition bias. Quantifying DFEs of ~100 single mutations obtained from mutation accumulation experiments for each strain, we find strong support for the theoretical prediction. Strains that oppose the ancestral bias (i.e., with a strong transversion bias) have DFEs with the highest proportion of beneficial mutations, whereas strains that exacerbate the ancestral transition bias have up to 10-fold fewer beneficial mutations. Such dramatic differences in the DFE should drive large variation in the rate and outcome of adaptation, suggesting an important and generalized evolutionary role for mutation bias shifts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS Biology
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003282
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mutation bias alters the distribution of fitness effects of mutations

Mrudula Sane, Deepa Agashe, Shazia Parveen
4 citations
PLoS Biology
Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
7.27
article

Mutation bias alters the distribution of fitness effects of mutations

Mrudula Sane, Deepa Agashe, Shazia Parveen
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Mutation bias is an important factor determining the diversity of genetic variants available for selection. As adaptation proceeds and some beneficial mutations are fixed, new beneficial mutations become rare, limiting further adaptation. The depletion of beneficial mutations is especially stark within the mutational class favored by the existing mutation bias. Recent theoretical work predicts that this problem may be alleviated by a change in the direction of mutation bias (i.e., a bias reversal). If populations sample previously underexplored types of mutations, the distribution of fitness effects (DFE) of mutations should shift towards more beneficial mutations. Here, we test this prediction using Escherichia coli, which has a transition mutation bias, with ~54% single-nucleotide mutations being transitions compared to the unbiased expectation of ~33% transitions. We generated mutant strains with a wide range of mutation biases, from 97% transitions to 98% transversions, either reinforcing or reversing the wild-type transition bias. Quantifying DFEs of ~100 single mutations obtained from mutation accumulation experiments for each strain, we find strong support for the theoretical prediction. Strains that oppose the ancestral bias (i.e., with a strong transversion bias) have DFEs with the highest proportion of beneficial mutations, whereas strains that exacerbate the ancestral transition bias have up to 10-fold fewer beneficial mutations. Such dramatic differences in the DFE should drive large variation in the rate and outcome of adaptation, suggesting an important and generalized evolutionary role for mutation bias shifts.

PLoS BiologyVol. 23(7)
National Centre for Biological Sciences (IN)
University Grants Commission, The Wellcome Trust DBT India Alliance, National Centre for Biological Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
7.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.