Comparative Study of Sarcasm Detection Using Glove + LSTM Technique in Machine Learning

Natural language processing (NLP) finds it difficult to detect sarcasm in text since it depends on irony, context, and frequently contradicting cues. Applications like sentiment analysis, content moderation, and fake news detection all depend on an understanding of sarcasm. We compare sarcasm detection methods in this study utilizing two popular machine learning(ML) techniques: GloVe embeddings and LSTM (Long Short-Term Memory) networks. GloVe + LSTM's performance in detecting sarcasm in text is compared to that of other deep learning architectures (convolutional neural networks(CNN), vanilla RNNs) and conventional machine learning(ML) models (Support Vector Machine(SVM), Naïve-Bayes(NB)). Our findings show that, in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score, the GloVe + LSTM model performs better than conventional models. This study also highlights the effectiveness of GloVe embeddings for word representation and LSTM networks for capturing long-term dependencies in text, offering insights into the advantages and disadvantages of different sarcasm detection techniques.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iccsai64074.2025.11064122
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of Sarcasm Detection Using Glove + LSTM Technique in Machine Learning

Abhinandan Tripathi, Chaynika Srivastava, B. V. S. Anantha Kumar
1 citations
Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
1.67
article

Comparative Study of Sarcasm Detection Using Glove + LSTM Technique in Machine Learning

Abhinandan Tripathi, Chaynika Srivastava, B. V. S. Anantha Kumar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Natural language processing (NLP) finds it difficult to detect sarcasm in text since it depends on irony, context, and frequently contradicting cues. Applications like sentiment analysis, content moderation, and fake news detection all depend on an understanding of sarcasm. We compare sarcasm detection methods in this study utilizing two popular machine learning(ML) techniques: GloVe embeddings and LSTM (Long Short-Term Memory) networks. GloVe + LSTM's performance in detecting sarcasm in text is compared to that of other deep learning architectures (convolutional neural networks(CNN), vanilla RNNs) and conventional machine learning(ML) models (Support Vector Machine(SVM), Naïve-Bayes(NB)). Our findings show that, in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score, the GloVe + LSTM model performs better than conventional models. This study also highlights the effectiveness of GloVe embeddings for word representation and LSTM networks for capturing long-term dependencies in text, offering insights into the advantages and disadvantages of different sarcasm detection techniques.

Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gorakhpur University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
1.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.