Measuring social inequalities in self-reported miscarriage experiences in the United Kingdom

An estimated one in four pregnancies end in a miscarriage. Miscarriage may affect fertility intentions and worsen mental and physical health. Yet, we know little about how social inequalities affect the risk of experiencing miscarriage, and the few existing studies show mixed results. A social gradient in the risk of miscarriage may be related to societal structures shaping risk factors, such as stress, health behaviours, and age at pregnancy. We use the British Cohort Study (1970) to investigate whether individuals’ socioeconomic characteristics are associated with their likelihood of self-reporting a miscarriage over the reproductive life course. We apply a multi-level discrete-time event-history model to examine this likelihood according to occupational social class, income, and education. Our results are affected by the sub-population studied: among all women, those socioeconomically more disadvantaged have a higher risk of miscarriage at younger ages, but the direction of the association reverses towards the end of the reproductive life span. These differences disappear when analysing only those who self-reported a pregnancy. Methodological work tackling misreporting of miscarriage and other pregnancy outcomes is needed for more reliable estimates. A better understanding of this common reproductive event can help policy makers improve reproductive and population health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Critical Public Health
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/jcph.vi.79555
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring social inequalities in self-reported miscarriage experiences in the United Kingdom

Katherine Lisa Keenan, Heini Väisänen
4 citations
Journal of Critical Public Health
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
9.23
article

Measuring social inequalities in self-reported miscarriage experiences in the United Kingdom

Katherine Lisa Keenan, Heini Väisänen
article en
4 citations

Abstract

An estimated one in four pregnancies end in a miscarriage. Miscarriage may affect fertility intentions and worsen mental and physical health. Yet, we know little about how social inequalities affect the risk of experiencing miscarriage, and the few existing studies show mixed results. A social gradient in the risk of miscarriage may be related to societal structures shaping risk factors, such as stress, health behaviours, and age at pregnancy. We use the British Cohort Study (1970) to investigate whether individuals’ socioeconomic characteristics are associated with their likelihood of self-reporting a miscarriage over the reproductive life course. We apply a multi-level discrete-time event-history model to examine this likelihood according to occupational social class, income, and education. Our results are affected by the sub-population studied: among all women, those socioeconomically more disadvantaged have a higher risk of miscarriage at younger ages, but the direction of the association reverses towards the end of the reproductive life span. These differences disappear when analysing only those who self-reported a pregnancy. Methodological work tackling misreporting of miscarriage and other pregnancy outcomes is needed for more reliable estimates. A better understanding of this common reproductive event can help policy makers improve reproductive and population health.

Journal of Critical Public Health
Institut national d'études démographiques (FR), University of St Andrews (GB)
University College London, University of Oxford
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
9.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.