Machine Learning Analysis of Intensity Profiles and Key Indicators in Standard Microcycle of Professional Male Soccer Players

This study examined intensity profiles and key load indicators across different Match Days (MD) and playing positions within a standard microcycle in professional soccer. Longitudinal observational study with a machine learning-based analytical approach. Twenty-nine Italian Serie B players (25.9 ± 4.2 years) were monitored across 91 training sessions and 38 official matches during the 2023-2024 season. A total of 2,204 observations were recorded, categorizing players into six positional groups. A Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model was used to predict MD types (MD + 1, MD + 2, MD + 3, MD-3, MD-2, MD-1, and MD) based on external (Global Navigation Satellite Systems, GNSS data) and internal (Rating of Perceived Exertion, RPE) load indicators. The model achieved 84% accuracy with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.97, effectively classifying MD types. K-means clustering categorized intensity profiles into low, medium, and high levels, while feature importance analysis identified key variables. Significant interactions were found between playing position and MD types for total distance/min (F(25, 2168) = 2.764, <i>p</i> < .001), decelerations/min (F(25, 2168) = 1.58, <i>p</i> = .033), and distance per minute at 0-7 km/h (F(25, 2168) = 2.41, <i>p</i> < .001). No significant differences emerged for distance per minute > 14.4 km/h (F(25, 2168) = 0.952, <i>p</i> = .531), distance per minute > 19.8 km/h (F(25, 2168) = 0.843, <i>p</i> = .688), or accelerations/min (F(25, 2168) = 1.28, <i>p</i> = .162). Positional differences in training intensity across MD types, provide coaches with data-driven insights for optimizing training loads and recovery strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2025.2521495
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning Analysis of Intensity Profiles and Key Indicators in Standard Microcycle of Professional Male Soccer Players

Giuseppe Battaglia, Antonino Bianco, Filipe Manuel Clemente, Tindaro Bongiovanni et al.
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
Sports Performance and Training
article

Machine Learning Analysis of Intensity Profiles and Key Indicators in Standard Microcycle of Professional Male Soccer Players

Giuseppe Battaglia, Antonino Bianco, Filipe Manuel Clemente, Tindaro Bongiovanni, Marco Beato, Rabiu Muazu Musa, Marco Petrucci, Guglielmo Pillitteri
article en

Abstract

This study examined intensity profiles and key load indicators across different Match Days (MD) and playing positions within a standard microcycle in professional soccer. Longitudinal observational study with a machine learning-based analytical approach. Twenty-nine Italian Serie B players (25.9 ± 4.2 years) were monitored across 91 training sessions and 38 official matches during the 2023-2024 season. A total of 2,204 observations were recorded, categorizing players into six positional groups. A Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model was used to predict MD types (MD + 1, MD + 2, MD + 3, MD-3, MD-2, MD-1, and MD) based on external (Global Navigation Satellite Systems, GNSS data) and internal (Rating of Perceived Exertion, RPE) load indicators. The model achieved 84% accuracy with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.97, effectively classifying MD types. K-means clustering categorized intensity profiles into low, medium, and high levels, while feature importance analysis identified key variables. Significant interactions were found between playing position and MD types for total distance/min (F(25, 2168) = 2.764, <i>p</i> < .001), decelerations/min (F(25, 2168) = 1.58, <i>p</i> = .033), and distance per minute at 0-7 km/h (F(25, 2168) = 2.41, <i>p</i> < .001). No significant differences emerged for distance per minute > 14.4 km/h (F(25, 2168) = 0.952, <i>p</i> = .531), distance per minute > 19.8 km/h (F(25, 2168) = 0.843, <i>p</i> = .688), or accelerations/min (F(25, 2168) = 1.28, <i>p</i> = .162). Positional differences in training intensity across MD types, provide coaches with data-driven insights for optimizing training loads and recovery strategies.

Research Quarterly for Exercise and SportVol. 96(4)
Sprint (United States) (US), University of Suffolk (GB), Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (MY), Universidade Politécnica de Viana do Castelo (PT), Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport (PL), University of Bologna (IT)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.