IntelectualIsmo moral a la luz de Protágoras 310a–314c

In the discussion of Moral Intellectualism in the Protagoras, attention is not usually paid to how the narrative construction guides and complements the philosophical argument. In this article, I analyze the Section of Hippocrates (310a–314c) and argue that it provides a relevant guidance for the interpretation of Moral Intellectualism. In this passage, the idea of Moral Knowledge is introduced, but it is constructed as one (i) different from technical-productive knowledge, (ii) that cannot be reduced to definitional knowledge, and, furthermore, (iii) that cannot be taught without require a certain type of particular disposition of the learner. I argue these points using an analysis of three moments: the distinction that Socrates introduces between professional and general knowledge; the comparison of the sophist with the merchant; and the contradictory decision to go see Protagoras.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Eidos
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14482/eidos.43.753.951
Primary Topic
Classical Philosophy and Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IntelectualIsmo moral a la luz de Protágoras 310a–314c

Leonardo Rodríguez Acuña
Eidos
Classical Philosophy and Thought
article

IntelectualIsmo moral a la luz de Protágoras 310a–314c

Leonardo Rodríguez Acuña
article en

Abstract

In the discussion of Moral Intellectualism in the Protagoras, attention is not usually paid to how the narrative construction guides and complements the philosophical argument. In this article, I analyze the Section of Hippocrates (310a–314c) and argue that it provides a relevant guidance for the interpretation of Moral Intellectualism. In this passage, the idea of Moral Knowledge is introduced, but it is constructed as one (i) different from technical-productive knowledge, (ii) that cannot be reduced to definitional knowledge, and, furthermore, (iii) that cannot be taught without require a certain type of particular disposition of the learner. I argue these points using an analysis of three moments: the distinction that Socrates introduces between professional and general knowledge; the comparison of the sophist with the merchant; and the contradictory decision to go see Protagoras.

EidosVol. 43
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Classical Philosophy and Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.