The Evolution of Dependence and Cohesion in Incipient Endosymbioses

AbstractEukaryogenesis is the prototypical example of an egalitarian evolutionary transition in individuality, and endosymbiosis, more generally, is central to the origins of many complex biological systems. Why do only some symbioses undergo such a transition, and how does the host-symbiont relationship change during this process? Here, we characterize endosymbiosis by two emergent collective-level properties: host and symbiont survival as a collective ("mutual dependence") and the level of synchronized reproduction ("reproductive cohesion"). Using adaptive dynamics, we study the evolution of the traits underlying these properties. First, by adding a carrying capacity for the collective population-a realism omitted in previous models-we find novel reasons why complete dependence or cohesion might not evolve, thus providing further theoretical support for the rarity of transitions in individuality. Second, our model suggests that asymmetries in evolutionary outcomes of hosts and symbionts can be explained by a difference in their population growth parameters, coupled with their shared fate when in a collective. Last, we show that during the early stages of an endosymbiosis, even if investments in dependence and cohesion are uncorrelated, mutual dependence arises faster than reproductive cohesion. Our results hence shed light on three aspects of endosymbiosis: coevolution between the host and symbiont, coevolution between dependence and cohesion, and ultimately the opportunity to undergo an evolutionary transition. Connecting to ecological factors, this work uncovers fundamental properties of endosymbioses, providing a clear way forward for theoretical and empirical investigations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Naturalist
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/737588
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Evolution of Dependence and Cohesion in Incipient Endosymbioses

Gaurav S. Athreya, Peter Czuppon, Chaitanya S. Gokhale
1 citations
The American Naturalist
Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
1.67
article

The Evolution of Dependence and Cohesion in Incipient Endosymbioses

Gaurav S. Athreya, Peter Czuppon, Chaitanya S. Gokhale
article en
1 citations

Abstract

AbstractEukaryogenesis is the prototypical example of an egalitarian evolutionary transition in individuality, and endosymbiosis, more generally, is central to the origins of many complex biological systems. Why do only some symbioses undergo such a transition, and how does the host-symbiont relationship change during this process? Here, we characterize endosymbiosis by two emergent collective-level properties: host and symbiont survival as a collective ("mutual dependence") and the level of synchronized reproduction ("reproductive cohesion"). Using adaptive dynamics, we study the evolution of the traits underlying these properties. First, by adding a carrying capacity for the collective population-a realism omitted in previous models-we find novel reasons why complete dependence or cohesion might not evolve, thus providing further theoretical support for the rarity of transitions in individuality. Second, our model suggests that asymmetries in evolutionary outcomes of hosts and symbionts can be explained by a difference in their population growth parameters, coupled with their shared fate when in a collective. Last, we show that during the early stages of an endosymbiosis, even if investments in dependence and cohesion are uncorrelated, mutual dependence arises faster than reproductive cohesion. Our results hence shed light on three aspects of endosymbiosis: coevolution between the host and symbiont, coevolution between dependence and cohesion, and ultimately the opportunity to undergo an evolutionary transition. Connecting to ecological factors, this work uncovers fundamental properties of endosymbioses, providing a clear way forward for theoretical and empirical investigations.

The American NaturalistVol. 206(5)
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune (IN), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), University of Münster (DE), University of Würzburg (DE), Institute for Biodiversity (DE), Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology (DE), Institute of Molecular Biology (DE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
1.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.