Decline in capture rates of birds in the High Andes of Ecuador suggests broad-scale anthropogenic impacts to protected areas

Abstract There is a long history of using birds as indicators of pervasive environmental threats. In the High Andes, birds face potential threats from global climate change, and from the impacts of land use changes associated with logging, grazing, fire, and agricultural expansion. We use an 11-yr constant effort, avian mist-netting dataset from 2 protected areas in the High Andes of Azuay province, Ecuador, to explore how environmental change is affecting resident bird species in high elevation habitats. We estimated a statistically significant mean decrease of 2.8% in capture rate across years for the full species assemblage and across all habitats. Species-specific capture rates across habitats declined for 29 of the 38 species that met our inclusion criteria. When species were grouped by diet, body size, primary habitat occupied, or habitat breadth, capture rates did not change differently among ecological groups of birds. Although we cannot identify the mechanisms behind the decline, the broad nature of the decline suggests that human-induced environmental changes, including warming, altered rainfall patterns, and intensification of land-use, could be acting in combination, resulting in a decline in the populations of many bird species in the region’s protected areas. This study highlights how events occurring outside of protected areas may affect resident bird species in these high elevation habitats.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Auk
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithology/ukaf030
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decline in capture rates of birds in the High Andes of Ecuador suggests broad-scale anthropogenic impacts to protected areas

Steven C. Latta, Andrea Nieto, Catherine Helen Graham, Pedro X. Astudillo et al.
1 citations
The Auk
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
article

Decline in capture rates of birds in the High Andes of Ecuador suggests broad-scale anthropogenic impacts to protected areas

Steven C. Latta, Andrea Nieto, Catherine Helen Graham, Pedro X. Astudillo, Boris A. Tinoco, E. M. Scott
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract There is a long history of using birds as indicators of pervasive environmental threats. In the High Andes, birds face potential threats from global climate change, and from the impacts of land use changes associated with logging, grazing, fire, and agricultural expansion. We use an 11-yr constant effort, avian mist-netting dataset from 2 protected areas in the High Andes of Azuay province, Ecuador, to explore how environmental change is affecting resident bird species in high elevation habitats. We estimated a statistically significant mean decrease of 2.8% in capture rate across years for the full species assemblage and across all habitats. Species-specific capture rates across habitats declined for 29 of the 38 species that met our inclusion criteria. When species were grouped by diet, body size, primary habitat occupied, or habitat breadth, capture rates did not change differently among ecological groups of birds. Although we cannot identify the mechanisms behind the decline, the broad nature of the decline suggests that human-induced environmental changes, including warming, altered rainfall patterns, and intensification of land-use, could be acting in combination, resulting in a decline in the populations of many bird species in the region’s protected areas. This study highlights how events occurring outside of protected areas may affect resident bird species in these high elevation habitats.

The AukVol. 142(4)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH), Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (DE), Universidad del Azuay (EC), Allegheny Valley Hospital (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.