De la imaginación a la intuición en la interpretación de Heidegger acerca de Kant: la finitud humana como un obstáculo al peligro que acecha en el <i>a priori</i>

In his text Die Frage nach dem Ding, Heidegger offers an analysis of Kant’s thought that highlights the role of sensible intuition. This constitutes a shift in focus from his interpretation in Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik, where transcendental imagination is the center of attention. In this paper, I provide an analysis of the reason for this change, suggesting that it is linked to an intensification of Heidegger’s concern for human finitude in relation to the notion of “creation”, which in turn responds to the fact that, by the mid-1930s, Heidegger realizes that thinking of being as the a priori carries a danger. This lies in the fact that being thus thought can detach itself from what is given in everyday experience and become determined by pure reason alone, thus turning into a representation against experience, characteristic of modern scientific thinking and whose ultimate aspiration is the creation of existence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tópicos Revista de Filosofía
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v730.3346
Primary Topic
Philosophical Thought and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

De la imaginación a la intuición en la interpretación de Heidegger acerca de Kant: la finitud humana como un obstáculo al peligro que acecha en el a priori

Cristina Crichton
Tópicos Revista de Filosofía
Philosophical Thought and Analysis
article

De la imaginación a la intuición en la interpretación de Heidegger acerca de Kant: la finitud humana como un obstáculo al peligro que acecha en el a priori

Cristina Crichton
article en

Abstract

In his text Die Frage nach dem Ding, Heidegger offers an analysis of Kant’s thought that highlights the role of sensible intuition. This constitutes a shift in focus from his interpretation in Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik, where transcendental imagination is the center of attention. In this paper, I provide an analysis of the reason for this change, suggesting that it is linked to an intensification of Heidegger’s concern for human finitude in relation to the notion of “creation”, which in turn responds to the fact that, by the mid-1930s, Heidegger realizes that thinking of being as the a priori carries a danger. This lies in the fact that being thus thought can detach itself from what is given in everyday experience and become determined by pure reason alone, thus turning into a representation against experience, characteristic of modern scientific thinking and whose ultimate aspiration is the creation of existence.

Tópicos Revista de Filosofía(73)
Adolfo Ibáñez University (CL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Philosophical Thought and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

De la imaginación a la intuición en la interpretación de Heidegger acerca de Kant: la finitud humana como un obstáculo al peligro que acecha en el <i>a priori</i> — Cristina Crichton · Tópicos Revista de Filosofía (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS