Muddy Lines and Murky Waters: The Making of a Colonial Deltaic Forest, 1816–1828

This article focuses on the extensive, low-lying mangrove forests in the lower Gangetic Delta, commonly called the Sundarbans, in the early decades of the nineteenth century. The English East India Company (EIC) sought to bring this shifting, unstable, partially submerged, and thickly forested deltaic terrain into its framework of civil law and revenue administration. The people most intimately connected with the forest, however, were marginalized in the EIC state’s correspondences and reports. The EIC exerted a stranglehold over the labor and movement of itinerant forest users like boaters, fishers, woodcutters, and honey collectors. They were removed from the forest as their subsistence base and compelled to work as agricultural laborers or salt boilers to further the company’s mission of maximum revenue extraction from the Sundarbans. This had important long-term environmental ramifications, including intensified exploitation of a much-shrunken forest and heightened human-tiger conflict in the region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental History
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/737169
Primary Topic
Archaeology and Natural History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Muddy Lines and Murky Waters: The Making of a Colonial Deltaic Forest, 1816–1828

S. N. Mukherjee
Environmental History
Archaeology and Natural History
article

Muddy Lines and Murky Waters: The Making of a Colonial Deltaic Forest, 1816–1828

S. N. Mukherjee
article en

Abstract

This article focuses on the extensive, low-lying mangrove forests in the lower Gangetic Delta, commonly called the Sundarbans, in the early decades of the nineteenth century. The English East India Company (EIC) sought to bring this shifting, unstable, partially submerged, and thickly forested deltaic terrain into its framework of civil law and revenue administration. The people most intimately connected with the forest, however, were marginalized in the EIC state’s correspondences and reports. The EIC exerted a stranglehold over the labor and movement of itinerant forest users like boaters, fishers, woodcutters, and honey collectors. They were removed from the forest as their subsistence base and compelled to work as agricultural laborers or salt boilers to further the company’s mission of maximum revenue extraction from the Sundarbans. This had important long-term environmental ramifications, including intensified exploitation of a much-shrunken forest and heightened human-tiger conflict in the region.

Environmental History
University of California, Davis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Archaeology and Natural History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.