Bioethical aspects in the approach to anorexia nervosa

Abstract This article aims to discuss the bioethical dilemma arising from how anorexic patients face treatment and recovery. Since the first reports in the 14th century, there has been a strong opposition by anorexic patients to attempts by relatives or health professionals to convince them to eat the necessary amount to meet their needs and maintain adequate weight. Much ethical discussion arises from this strong anorexic stance against treatment, especially in cases of severe and long-lasting anorexia. Are patients competent to refuse treatment? Should health professionals, in the name of the bioethical principles of beneficence and non-maleficence, be allowed to order compulsory treatment? Health professionals, dedicated to life, can oppose illness or death through self-imposed fasting. Patients are bothered by the lack of understanding and empathy and the refusal to examine the logical foundations of their position, which are contrary to biomedical logic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Bioética
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-803420253860en
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bioethical aspects in the approach to anorexia nervosa

Joaquim Antônio César Mota, Tatiana Mattos do Amaral, Henrique Oswaldo da Gama Tôrres
Revista Bioética
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
article

Bioethical aspects in the approach to anorexia nervosa

Joaquim Antônio César Mota, Tatiana Mattos do Amaral, Henrique Oswaldo da Gama Tôrres
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article aims to discuss the bioethical dilemma arising from how anorexic patients face treatment and recovery. Since the first reports in the 14th century, there has been a strong opposition by anorexic patients to attempts by relatives or health professionals to convince them to eat the necessary amount to meet their needs and maintain adequate weight. Much ethical discussion arises from this strong anorexic stance against treatment, especially in cases of severe and long-lasting anorexia. Are patients competent to refuse treatment? Should health professionals, in the name of the bioethical principles of beneficence and non-maleficence, be allowed to order compulsory treatment? Health professionals, dedicated to life, can oppose illness or death through self-imposed fasting. Patients are bothered by the lack of understanding and empathy and the refusal to examine the logical foundations of their position, which are contrary to biomedical logic.

Revista BioéticaVol. 33
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.