Unification of dermatoscopic terminology in the russian language

Background. Today, two main approaches to interpreting dermatoscopic images are used: descriptive and metaphorical terminology. The lack of a unified dermatoscopic terminology in the Russian language brings risks of ambiguous interpretation of signs, difficulties in describing dermatoscopic status, challenges in follow-up monitoring, and limited comparability of scientific data. Aim. To assess the terminology and protocols used in dermatoscopy when providing medical care to patients with cutaneous and subcutaneous diseases, skin neoplasms, and cosmetic skin defects in order to improve the quality of medical care. Methods. A special questionnaire (52 questions) was developed. Interviews may be performed in a mixed format. An anonymous survey of 402 physicians was conducted. Respondents were asked to describe three dermatoscopic images. Results. The vast majority of respondents noted the following aspects: the need for specialized terminology in order to describe and understand the dermatoscopic status (95%); lack of previously acquired knowledge and skills to use this diagnostic method freely (73.4%); and need for in-depth investigation of terminological nuances (89.1%). Most respondents (93.5%) supported the idea of establishing a unified dermatoscopic terminology in Russian. The specialists concerned use an extremely wide range of terms to describe the dermatoscopic presentation. More than a half of the respondents (58.5 %) reported difficulties in interpreting the dermatoscopic presentation of skin neoplasms described by another specialist. Conclusion. The analysis revealed no unified standards for dermatoscopic terminology in Russian. The development of a standardized terminological system for dermatoscopy in the Russian Federation requires consensus conferences involving the specialists concerned, elaboration of proposed advanced training programs on dermatoscopy as well as relevant methodological recommendations, and their consistent implementation in advanced training programs for doctors of various specialties (within medical universities and postgraduate education system).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vestnik dermatologii i venerologii
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25208/vdv16894
Primary Topic
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unification of dermatoscopic terminology in the russian language

А. А. Мартынов, Margarita R. Rakhmatulina, Anna V. Vlasova, А. В. Соколова et al.
Vestnik dermatologii i venerologii
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
article

Unification of dermatoscopic terminology in the russian language

А. А. Мартынов, Margarita R. Rakhmatulina, Anna V. Vlasova, А. В. Соколова, Viktoria L. Te
article en

Abstract

Background. Today, two main approaches to interpreting dermatoscopic images are used: descriptive and metaphorical terminology. The lack of a unified dermatoscopic terminology in the Russian language brings risks of ambiguous interpretation of signs, difficulties in describing dermatoscopic status, challenges in follow-up monitoring, and limited comparability of scientific data. Aim. To assess the terminology and protocols used in dermatoscopy when providing medical care to patients with cutaneous and subcutaneous diseases, skin neoplasms, and cosmetic skin defects in order to improve the quality of medical care. Methods. A special questionnaire (52 questions) was developed. Interviews may be performed in a mixed format. An anonymous survey of 402 physicians was conducted. Respondents were asked to describe three dermatoscopic images. Results. The vast majority of respondents noted the following aspects: the need for specialized terminology in order to describe and understand the dermatoscopic status (95%); lack of previously acquired knowledge and skills to use this diagnostic method freely (73.4%); and need for in-depth investigation of terminological nuances (89.1%). Most respondents (93.5%) supported the idea of establishing a unified dermatoscopic terminology in Russian. The specialists concerned use an extremely wide range of terms to describe the dermatoscopic presentation. More than a half of the respondents (58.5 %) reported difficulties in interpreting the dermatoscopic presentation of skin neoplasms described by another specialist. Conclusion. The analysis revealed no unified standards for dermatoscopic terminology in Russian. The development of a standardized terminological system for dermatoscopy in the Russian Federation requires consensus conferences involving the specialists concerned, elaboration of proposed advanced training programs on dermatoscopy as well as relevant methodological recommendations, and their consistent implementation in advanced training programs for doctors of various specialties (within medical universities and postgraduate education system).

Vestnik dermatologii i venerologiiVol. 101(3)
Sechenov University (RU), Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education (RU), State Research Center for Dermatovenereology and Cosmetology (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.