Analysis of the Adequacy of Undergraduate Education in Preventive Medicine and Its Influencing Factors

Background and Aim: The cultivation of competencies among preventive medicine undergraduates is essential for developing high-quality public health professionals, especially in the context of China's Healthy China 2030 initiative. However, disparities in competency development persist due to factors such as gender, family background, and economic conditions. This study aims to assess the adequacy of competency cultivation among preventive medicine students in a local medical college, identify influencing factors, and provide insights for optimizing medical education strategies. Materials and Methods: This study utilized data from the China Medical Student Training and Development Survey (CMSS), targeting 569 preventive medicine undergraduates. The structured questionnaire measured competency adequacy across four dimensions: scientific and academic ability (5 items), clinical/practical ability (3 items), health and social responsibility (3 items), and professional quality (9 items). Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater adequacy. Data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0, employing descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, one-way ANOVA, and regression analysis to explore influencing factors. Results: The overall competency adequacy scores ranked as follows: health and social responsibility (3.72) > professional quality (3.70) > scientific and academic ability (3.56) > clinical/practical ability (3.52). Male students scored higher in clinical/practical ability (P < 0.05), while urban students outperformed rural students in multiple dimensions. Students with medical family backgrounds, higher family income, and a career aspiration in medicine demonstrated significantly higher competency adequacy scores (P < 0.05). Economic pressure negatively affected competency development, and financial aid showed a limited impact on improving competency adequacy. Conclusion: The findings highlight imbalances in competency development, particularly in clinical/practical ability. Gender, urban-rural disparities, financial conditions, and career aspirations significantly influence competency adequacy. To bridge these gaps, medical education reforms should enhance practical training, provide targeted support for disadvantaged students, and optimize interdisciplinary learning opportunities. Future studies should further explore tailored interventions to improve competency development in preventive medicine education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60027/ijsasr.2025.6820
Primary Topic
Medical Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of the Adequacy of Undergraduate Education in Preventive Medicine and Its Influencing Factors

Su Fang, Xiaoqiang Qiu, Thanawat Imsomboon, Siriluck Jittrabiab
International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews
Medical Research and Treatments
article

Analysis of the Adequacy of Undergraduate Education in Preventive Medicine and Its Influencing Factors

Su Fang, Xiaoqiang Qiu, Thanawat Imsomboon, Siriluck Jittrabiab
article en

Abstract

Background and Aim: The cultivation of competencies among preventive medicine undergraduates is essential for developing high-quality public health professionals, especially in the context of China's Healthy China 2030 initiative. However, disparities in competency development persist due to factors such as gender, family background, and economic conditions. This study aims to assess the adequacy of competency cultivation among preventive medicine students in a local medical college, identify influencing factors, and provide insights for optimizing medical education strategies. Materials and Methods: This study utilized data from the China Medical Student Training and Development Survey (CMSS), targeting 569 preventive medicine undergraduates. The structured questionnaire measured competency adequacy across four dimensions: scientific and academic ability (5 items), clinical/practical ability (3 items), health and social responsibility (3 items), and professional quality (9 items). Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater adequacy. Data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0, employing descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, one-way ANOVA, and regression analysis to explore influencing factors. Results: The overall competency adequacy scores ranked as follows: health and social responsibility (3.72) > professional quality (3.70) > scientific and academic ability (3.56) > clinical/practical ability (3.52). Male students scored higher in clinical/practical ability (P < 0.05), while urban students outperformed rural students in multiple dimensions. Students with medical family backgrounds, higher family income, and a career aspiration in medicine demonstrated significantly higher competency adequacy scores (P < 0.05). Economic pressure negatively affected competency development, and financial aid showed a limited impact on improving competency adequacy. Conclusion: The findings highlight imbalances in competency development, particularly in clinical/practical ability. Gender, urban-rural disparities, financial conditions, and career aspirations significantly influence competency adequacy. To bridge these gaps, medical education reforms should enhance practical training, provide targeted support for disadvantaged students, and optimize interdisciplinary learning opportunities. Future studies should further explore tailored interventions to improve competency development in preventive medicine education.

International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science ReviewsVol. 5(4)
Guangxi Medical University (CN), Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Medical Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.