An Integrated Assessment Approach for Underground Gas Storage in Multi-Layered Water-Bearing Gas Reservoirs

In the global energy sector, water-bearing reservoir-typed gas storage accounts for about 30% of underground gas storage (UGS) reservoirs and is vital for natural gas storage, balancing gas consumption, and ensuring energy supply stability. However, when constructing the UGS in the M gas reservoir, selecting suitable areas poses a challenge due to the complicated gas–water distribution in the multi-layered water-bearing gas reservoir with a long production history. To address this issue and enhance energy storage efficiency, this study presents an integrated geomechanical-hydraulic assessment framework for choosing optimal UGS construction horizons in multi-layered water-bearing gas reservoirs. The horizons and sub-layers of the gas reservoir have been quantitatively assessed to filter out the favorable areas, considering both aspects of geological characteristics and production dynamics. Geologically, caprock-sealing capacity was assessed via rock properties, Shale Gouge Ratio (SGR), and transect breakthrough pressure. Dynamically, water invasion characteristics and the water–gas distribution pattern were analyzed. Based on both geological and dynamic assessment results, the favorable layers for UGS construction were selected. Then, a compositional numerical model was established to digitally simulate and validate the feasibility of constructing and operating the M UGS in the target layers. The results indicated the following: (1) The selected area has an SGR greater than 50%, and the caprock has a continuous lateral distribution with a thickness range from 53 to 78 m and a permeability of less than 0.05 mD. Within the operational pressure ranging from 8 MPa to 12.8 MPa, the mechanical properties of the caprock shale had no obvious changes after 1000 fatigue cycles, which demonstrated the good sealing capacity of the caprock. (2) The main water-producing formations were identified, and the sub-layers with inactive edge water and low levels of water intrusion were selected. After the comprehensive analysis, the I-2 and I-6 sub-layer in the M 8 block and M 14 block were selected as the target layers. The numerical simulation results indicated an effective working gas volume of 263 million cubic meters, demonstrating the significant potential of these layers for UGS construction and their positive impact on energy storage capacity and supply stability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-07-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146401
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Integrated Assessment Approach for Underground Gas Storage in Multi-Layered Water-Bearing Gas Reservoirs

Ziyi Feng, Ziang He, Hongcheng Xu, Qiqi Wanyan et al.
2 citations
Sustainability
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
1.43
article

An Integrated Assessment Approach for Underground Gas Storage in Multi-Layered Water-Bearing Gas Reservoirs

Ziyi Feng, Ziang He, Hongcheng Xu, Qiqi Wanyan, Junyu You, Songze Li, Xiaoliang Huang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In the global energy sector, water-bearing reservoir-typed gas storage accounts for about 30% of underground gas storage (UGS) reservoirs and is vital for natural gas storage, balancing gas consumption, and ensuring energy supply stability. However, when constructing the UGS in the M gas reservoir, selecting suitable areas poses a challenge due to the complicated gas–water distribution in the multi-layered water-bearing gas reservoir with a long production history. To address this issue and enhance energy storage efficiency, this study presents an integrated geomechanical-hydraulic assessment framework for choosing optimal UGS construction horizons in multi-layered water-bearing gas reservoirs. The horizons and sub-layers of the gas reservoir have been quantitatively assessed to filter out the favorable areas, considering both aspects of geological characteristics and production dynamics. Geologically, caprock-sealing capacity was assessed via rock properties, Shale Gouge Ratio (SGR), and transect breakthrough pressure. Dynamically, water invasion characteristics and the water–gas distribution pattern were analyzed. Based on both geological and dynamic assessment results, the favorable layers for UGS construction were selected. Then, a compositional numerical model was established to digitally simulate and validate the feasibility of constructing and operating the M UGS in the target layers. The results indicated the following: (1) The selected area has an SGR greater than 50%, and the caprock has a continuous lateral distribution with a thickness range from 53 to 78 m and a permeability of less than 0.05 mD. Within the operational pressure ranging from 8 MPa to 12.8 MPa, the mechanical properties of the caprock shale had no obvious changes after 1000 fatigue cycles, which demonstrated the good sealing capacity of the caprock. (2) The main water-producing formations were identified, and the sub-layers with inactive edge water and low levels of water intrusion were selected. After the comprehensive analysis, the I-2 and I-6 sub-layer in the M 8 block and M 14 block were selected as the target layers. The numerical simulation results indicated an effective working gas volume of 263 million cubic meters, demonstrating the significant potential of these layers for UGS construction and their positive impact on energy storage capacity and supply stability.

SustainabilityVol. 17(14)
Chongqing University of Science and Technology (CN), Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.