Comparative Outcomes of the Next-Generation Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens and Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens in Cataract Surgery

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> A new, purely refractive extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) was designed with a continuous change in power to bridge the gap between monofocal and multifocal IOLs. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world clinical outcomes of the new EDOF IOL compared with those of the enhanced monofocal IOL. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis was conducted on 100 eyes from 50 patients undergoing bilateral cataract surgery with either the PureSee™ EDOF (ZEN00V) or Eyhance™ (ICB00) monofocal IOL at a single institution. Visual acuity, defocus curves, contrast sensitivity, and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated three months postoperatively. <b>Results:</b> The ZEN00V group demonstrated superior uncorrected intermediate (0.11 ± 0.08 vs. 0.17 ± 0.11 logMAR, <i>p</i> = 0.006) and near visual acuity (0.25 ± 0.08 vs. 0.31 ± 0.13 logMAR, <i>p</i> = 0.023) compared to the ICB00 group, with comparable distance visual acuity. Both groups exhibited comparable defocus curves and contrast sensitivity. While photic phenomena were more frequent in the ZEN00V group, spectacle dependence was significantly lower for near vision (36% vs. 80%, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and comparable for intermediate and far vision. <b>Conclusions:</b> The PureSee™ EDOF IOL demonstrated enhanced intermediate and near vision with minimal compromise to distance vision while maintaining high contrast sensitivity. It also offered significant spectacle independence and patient satisfaction, making it a promising option for presbyopia correction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14144967
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Outcomes of the Next-Generation Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens and Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens in Cataract Surgery

Ahmed Elsheikh, Hyunjin Park, Ella SeoYeon Park, Bo Yi Kim et al.
6 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
8.13
article

Comparative Outcomes of the Next-Generation Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens and Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens in Cataract Surgery

Ahmed Elsheikh, Hyunjin Park, Ella SeoYeon Park, Bo Yi Kim, Ikhyun Jun, Tae‐im Kim, Kyoung Yul Seo, Do Young Kim
article en
6 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> A new, purely refractive extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) was designed with a continuous change in power to bridge the gap between monofocal and multifocal IOLs. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world clinical outcomes of the new EDOF IOL compared with those of the enhanced monofocal IOL. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis was conducted on 100 eyes from 50 patients undergoing bilateral cataract surgery with either the PureSee™ EDOF (ZEN00V) or Eyhance™ (ICB00) monofocal IOL at a single institution. Visual acuity, defocus curves, contrast sensitivity, and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated three months postoperatively. <b>Results:</b> The ZEN00V group demonstrated superior uncorrected intermediate (0.11 ± 0.08 vs. 0.17 ± 0.11 logMAR, <i>p</i> = 0.006) and near visual acuity (0.25 ± 0.08 vs. 0.31 ± 0.13 logMAR, <i>p</i> = 0.023) compared to the ICB00 group, with comparable distance visual acuity. Both groups exhibited comparable defocus curves and contrast sensitivity. While photic phenomena were more frequent in the ZEN00V group, spectacle dependence was significantly lower for near vision (36% vs. 80%, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and comparable for intermediate and far vision. <b>Conclusions:</b> The PureSee™ EDOF IOL demonstrated enhanced intermediate and near vision with minimal compromise to distance vision while maintaining high contrast sensitivity. It also offered significant spectacle independence and patient satisfaction, making it a promising option for presbyopia correction.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(14)
Pohang University of Science and Technology (KR), Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Liverpool (GB), Yonsei University (KR), National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB), Nune Eye Hospital (KR), Beijing Advanced Sciences and Innovation Center (CN), University College London (GB), Beihang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
8.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.