Airborne SARS-CoV-2 Detection by ddPCR in Adequately Ventilated Hospital Corridors

Indoors, the infection risk of diseases transmitted through the airborne route is estimated from indoor carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) levels. However, the approaches to assess this risk do not account for the airborne concentration of pathogens, among other limitations. In this study, we analyzed the relationship between airborne SARS-CoV-2 levels and environmental parameters. Bioaerosols were sampled (<i>n</i> = 40) in hospital corridors of two wards differing in the COVID-19 severity of the admitted patients. SARS-CoV-2 levels were quantified using droplet digital PCR. SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 60% of the total air samples. The ward where the mildly ill patients were admitted had a higher occupancy, transit of people in the corridor, and CO<sub>2</sub> levels, but there were no significant differences in SARS-CoV-2 detection between wards. The mean CO<sub>2</sub> concentration in the positive samples was 569 ± 35.6 ppm. Considering all samples, the CO<sub>2</sub> levels in the corridor were positively correlated with patient door openings but inversely correlated with SARS-CoV-2 levels. In conclusion, airborne SARS-CoV-2 can be detected indoors with optimal ventilation, and its levels do not scale with CO<sub>2</sub> concentration in hospital corridors. Therefore, CO<sub>2</sub> assessment should not be interpreted as a surrogate of airborne viral presence in all indoor spaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Toxics
Published
2025-07-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13070583
Primary Topic
Infection Control and Ventilation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Airborne SARS-CoV-2 Detection by ddPCR in Adequately Ventilated Hospital Corridors

Antoni Colom, Herme G. Baldoví, Antonio Doménech‐Sánchez, Ernest Sala et al.
Toxics
Infection Control and Ventilation
article

Airborne SARS-CoV-2 Detection by ddPCR in Adequately Ventilated Hospital Corridors

Antoni Colom, Herme G. Baldoví, Antonio Doménech‐Sánchez, Ernest Sala, Joan Truyols-Vives, Josep Mercader, Marta González-López, Alexander Einschütz-López
article en

Abstract

Indoors, the infection risk of diseases transmitted through the airborne route is estimated from indoor carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) levels. However, the approaches to assess this risk do not account for the airborne concentration of pathogens, among other limitations. In this study, we analyzed the relationship between airborne SARS-CoV-2 levels and environmental parameters. Bioaerosols were sampled (<i>n</i> = 40) in hospital corridors of two wards differing in the COVID-19 severity of the admitted patients. SARS-CoV-2 levels were quantified using droplet digital PCR. SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 60% of the total air samples. The ward where the mildly ill patients were admitted had a higher occupancy, transit of people in the corridor, and CO<sub>2</sub> levels, but there were no significant differences in SARS-CoV-2 detection between wards. The mean CO<sub>2</sub> concentration in the positive samples was 569 ± 35.6 ppm. Considering all samples, the CO<sub>2</sub> levels in the corridor were positively correlated with patient door openings but inversely correlated with SARS-CoV-2 levels. In conclusion, airborne SARS-CoV-2 can be detected indoors with optimal ventilation, and its levels do not scale with CO<sub>2</sub> concentration in hospital corridors. Therefore, CO<sub>2</sub> assessment should not be interpreted as a surrogate of airborne viral presence in all indoor spaces.

ToxicsVol. 13(7)
Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (ES), Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (ES), Universitat Politècnica de València (ES), BOKU University (AT)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Infection Control and Ventilation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.