Individual and Joint Situations

Abstract In recent years, various metaphysicians have made use of qualifications that may apply to different entities relative to different individuals in accounts of such phenomena as color, secondary qualities, subjectivity, and relations. The primary purpose of this paper is to propose a further use for relative qualifications in an account of situations, where situations here are understood as engaged orientations toward the world. My central claim is that situations are distinguished from one another through the ways in which entities are qualified differently relative to different individuals. Thus, to imagine another person’s situation is to imagine entities as qualified differently—as they are for the other rather than for oneself–and need not involve directly imagining anything about that person. I show how situations involving multiple individuals may be derived from individual situations by suppressing conflicting qualifications. The resulting joint situations retain more or less of the action-guiding structure of individual situations depending on the similarity or diversity of the individuals involved.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Erkenntnis
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-025-00988-8
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Individual and Joint Situations

Maureen P. Donnelly
Erkenntnis
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
article

Individual and Joint Situations

Maureen P. Donnelly
article en

Abstract

Abstract In recent years, various metaphysicians have made use of qualifications that may apply to different entities relative to different individuals in accounts of such phenomena as color, secondary qualities, subjectivity, and relations. The primary purpose of this paper is to propose a further use for relative qualifications in an account of situations, where situations here are understood as engaged orientations toward the world. My central claim is that situations are distinguished from one another through the ways in which entities are qualified differently relative to different individuals. Thus, to imagine another person’s situation is to imagine entities as qualified differently—as they are for the other rather than for oneself–and need not involve directly imagining anything about that person. I show how situations involving multiple individuals may be derived from individual situations by suppressing conflicting qualifications. The resulting joint situations retain more or less of the action-guiding structure of individual situations depending on the similarity or diversity of the individuals involved.

Erkenntnis
Buffalo State University (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.