To Repair or not to Repair? Disclosing the Subject in Technical Mediation

This paper aims to develop a more comprehensive account of subjectivity in human-technology relations. Our argument unfolds in two stages. First, we contend that classical mediation theory falls short in addressing subjectivity, as it remains confined to functionalist and instrumentalist perspectives. Rather than rejecting postphenomenology, we seek to renew and deepen it by reconnecting it to its phenomenological roots as envisioned by Don Ihde. Second, we extend mediation theory through what we call the “technology lifecycle.” This framework retains attention to functionality and design while explicitly incorporating two additional and equally important dimensions: breakdown and maintenance. To adequately grasp these moments, we draw on a Ricoeurian interpretation of the dynamic between the designer-user subject and the “subject without technology,” who is primarily concerned with maintenance and care. By revisiting and expanding postphenomenology in this way, we aim to offer a richer and more nuanced understanding of the subject of technology—the central concern of this paper.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy & Technology
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-00930-4
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To Repair or not to Repair? Disclosing the Subject in Technical Mediation

Ciano Aydin, Luca M. Possati
Philosophy & Technology
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

To Repair or not to Repair? Disclosing the Subject in Technical Mediation

Ciano Aydin, Luca M. Possati
article en

Abstract

This paper aims to develop a more comprehensive account of subjectivity in human-technology relations. Our argument unfolds in two stages. First, we contend that classical mediation theory falls short in addressing subjectivity, as it remains confined to functionalist and instrumentalist perspectives. Rather than rejecting postphenomenology, we seek to renew and deepen it by reconnecting it to its phenomenological roots as envisioned by Don Ihde. Second, we extend mediation theory through what we call the “technology lifecycle.” This framework retains attention to functionality and design while explicitly incorporating two additional and equally important dimensions: breakdown and maintenance. To adequately grasp these moments, we draw on a Ricoeurian interpretation of the dynamic between the designer-user subject and the “subject without technology,” who is primarily concerned with maintenance and care. By revisiting and expanding postphenomenology in this way, we aim to offer a richer and more nuanced understanding of the subject of technology—the central concern of this paper.

Philosophy & TechnologyVol. 38(3)
University of Twente (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

To Repair or not to Repair? Disclosing the Subject in Technical Mediation — Ciano Aydin, Luca M. Possati · Philosophy & Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS