AI-driven wastewater management through comparative analysis of feature selection techniques and predictive models

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in wastewater treatment management offers a promising approach to optimizing effluent quality predictions and enhancing operational efficiency. This study evaluates the performance of machine learning models in predicting key wastewater effluent parameters Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Total Suspended Solids (TSS), Total Effluent Nitrogen and Total Effluent Phosphorus. Three feature selection techniques were applied: SelectKBest, Mutual Information, and Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) using Random Forest to identify the most significant predictors. The study leveraged ensemble learning models, including XGBoost, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and LightGBM, and compared them with Decision Tree models. The results demonstrate that effluent volatile suspended solids (VSS) consistently held the highest predictive importance across all feature selection methods. Ensemble models significantly outperformed Decision Trees, with Gradient Boosting achieving the best predictive accuracy for TSS and total nitrogen (Mean Absolute Error (MAE): 3.667 [Formula: see text]: 97.53), XGBoost excelling in COD prediction with MAE and [Formula: see text] of 6.251 and 83. 41%, respectively, and XGBoost showing superior performance for BOD (MAE: 1.589 [Formula: see text]:79.64%). LightGBM yielded the highest precision in predicting total phosphate with MAE and a [Formula: see text] score of 0.230 and 28. 68%, respectively. Decision tree models consistently underperformed, exhibiting the highest error rates. These findings highlight the potential of AI-driven approaches in wastewater management to improve decision-making, regulatory compliance, and resource efficiency. However, limitations such as operational irregularities and seasonal variations remain challenges for further refinement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-07124-0
Citations
22
Primary Topic
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-driven wastewater management through comparative analysis of feature selection techniques and predictive models

Shtwai Alsubai, Muhammad Owais Raza, Bestami Özkaya, Feyyaz Cengiz Dikmen et al.
22 citations
Scientific Reports
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
17.98
article

AI-driven wastewater management through comparative analysis of feature selection techniques and predictive models

Shtwai Alsubai, Muhammad Owais Raza, Bestami Özkaya, Feyyaz Cengiz Dikmen, Tunç Aşuroğlu, Jawad Rasheed, Ahmet Demir
article en
22 citations

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in wastewater treatment management offers a promising approach to optimizing effluent quality predictions and enhancing operational efficiency. This study evaluates the performance of machine learning models in predicting key wastewater effluent parameters Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Total Suspended Solids (TSS), Total Effluent Nitrogen and Total Effluent Phosphorus. Three feature selection techniques were applied: SelectKBest, Mutual Information, and Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) using Random Forest to identify the most significant predictors. The study leveraged ensemble learning models, including XGBoost, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and LightGBM, and compared them with Decision Tree models. The results demonstrate that effluent volatile suspended solids (VSS) consistently held the highest predictive importance across all feature selection methods. Ensemble models significantly outperformed Decision Trees, with Gradient Boosting achieving the best predictive accuracy for TSS and total nitrogen (Mean Absolute Error (MAE): 3.667 [Formula: see text]: 97.53), XGBoost excelling in COD prediction with MAE and [Formula: see text] of 6.251 and 83. 41%, respectively, and XGBoost showing superior performance for BOD (MAE: 1.589 [Formula: see text]:79.64%). LightGBM yielded the highest precision in predicting total phosphate with MAE and a [Formula: see text] score of 0.230 and 28. 68%, respectively. Decision tree models consistently underperformed, exhibiting the highest error rates. These findings highlight the potential of AI-driven approaches in wastewater management to improve decision-making, regulatory compliance, and resource efficiency. However, limitations such as operational irregularities and seasonal variations remain challenges for further refinement.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim Üniversitesi (TR), Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University (SA), Yıldız Technical University (TR), Istinye University (TR)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
17.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.