Echoing the Call: Standing in Defense of Academic Freedom for Our Field

This article joins the call to protect academic freedom and freedom of expression in scholarly work. In our commentary, we reflect on how Digital Journalism has long provided a space for scholarship that examines and challenges authoritarian pressure and political controls on journalistic and democratic institutions. We outline what is lost when academic inquiry is curtailed in the face of political pressure and efforts at authoritarian control, and underscore the importance of preserving and defending academic freedom and inquiry as a democratic imperative. In doing so, we echo calls to defend our colleagues’ research and our field from undue political pressure, wherever it occurs. While we advocate for a robust defense of this tradition in light of current political circumstances, we also pause to acknowledge our own shortcomings as a group of digital journalism scholars by highlighting the anti-democratic trends we might have missed in recent years, in the hopes we can avoid such blindspots in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Journalism
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2025.2532513
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Academic Freedom and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Echoing the Call: Standing in Defense of Academic Freedom for Our Field

Edson C. Tandoc, Kristy Hess, Scott A. Eldridge
1 citations
Digital Journalism
Academic Freedom and Politics
8.52
article

Echoing the Call: Standing in Defense of Academic Freedom for Our Field

Edson C. Tandoc, Kristy Hess, Scott A. Eldridge
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article joins the call to protect academic freedom and freedom of expression in scholarly work. In our commentary, we reflect on how Digital Journalism has long provided a space for scholarship that examines and challenges authoritarian pressure and political controls on journalistic and democratic institutions. We outline what is lost when academic inquiry is curtailed in the face of political pressure and efforts at authoritarian control, and underscore the importance of preserving and defending academic freedom and inquiry as a democratic imperative. In doing so, we echo calls to defend our colleagues’ research and our field from undue political pressure, wherever it occurs. While we advocate for a robust defense of this tradition in light of current political circumstances, we also pause to acknowledge our own shortcomings as a group of digital journalism scholars by highlighting the anti-democratic trends we might have missed in recent years, in the hopes we can avoid such blindspots in the future.

Digital JournalismVol. 13(10)
University of Groningen (NL), Nanyang Technological University (SG), Creative Victoria (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Academic Freedom and Politics
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.