Digital evidence and its use for criminal proceedings

This paper examines the role and admissibility of digital evidence, particularly data derived from instant messaging applications like WhatsApp and Telegram, in criminal proceedings within the legal context of the Slovak Republic. The focus is on the legal provisions and frameworks under the Slovak Criminal Procedure Code Act, especially regarding the seizure, preservation, and submission of digital data in criminal proceeding. A key aspect of this study is the exploration of how messages and other data from messaging applications are treated as evidence, addressing the complexities of their relevance, authenticity, and credibility in a legal context. In order to establish the admissibility of such evidence in court, the paper delves into essential principles such as the requirement for evidence to be relevant, authentic, and trustworthy. It highlights the fact that courts generally require clear authentication procedures to confirm the authorship of messages, which presents challenges due to the nature of online identities and the potential for manipulation or misrepresentation. The use of screenshots and the specific criteria that ensure they maintain evidentiary value are also discussed, reflecting the practical considerations involved in collecting and presenting digital evidence. Additionally, the paper critiques existing legal provisions in the Slovak Criminal Procedure Code, particularly those that address the seizure and handling of digital data stored on mobile devices and computers. There are notable ambiguities regarding the categorization of mobile devices as computers and the applicable procedures for accessing data from them. The study argues that the current legal framework should be amended to include a clear definition of digital evidence, to standardize the procedures for its collection, preservation, and presentation in court, and to resolve the conflicting interpretations that currently exist in practice. By examining these aspects, the paper contributes to a deeper understanding of how digital evidence is utilized in criminal investigations and legal proceedings, advocating for legislative updates to address the growing importance of digital data in modern criminal cases. Furthermore, it underscores the need for careful consideration of privacy rights and proportionality when dealing with personal information obtained from digital devices and online platforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence
Published
2025-07-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2025.03.3.19
Primary Topic
Digital and Cyber Forensics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital evidence and its use for criminal proceedings

Jakub Matis
Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence
Digital and Cyber Forensics
article

Digital evidence and its use for criminal proceedings

Jakub Matis
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the role and admissibility of digital evidence, particularly data derived from instant messaging applications like WhatsApp and Telegram, in criminal proceedings within the legal context of the Slovak Republic. The focus is on the legal provisions and frameworks under the Slovak Criminal Procedure Code Act, especially regarding the seizure, preservation, and submission of digital data in criminal proceeding. A key aspect of this study is the exploration of how messages and other data from messaging applications are treated as evidence, addressing the complexities of their relevance, authenticity, and credibility in a legal context. In order to establish the admissibility of such evidence in court, the paper delves into essential principles such as the requirement for evidence to be relevant, authentic, and trustworthy. It highlights the fact that courts generally require clear authentication procedures to confirm the authorship of messages, which presents challenges due to the nature of online identities and the potential for manipulation or misrepresentation. The use of screenshots and the specific criteria that ensure they maintain evidentiary value are also discussed, reflecting the practical considerations involved in collecting and presenting digital evidence. Additionally, the paper critiques existing legal provisions in the Slovak Criminal Procedure Code, particularly those that address the seizure and handling of digital data stored on mobile devices and computers. There are notable ambiguities regarding the categorization of mobile devices as computers and the applicable procedures for accessing data from them. The study argues that the current legal framework should be amended to include a clear definition of digital evidence, to standardize the procedures for its collection, preservation, and presentation in court, and to resolve the conflicting interpretations that currently exist in practice. By examining these aspects, the paper contributes to a deeper understanding of how digital evidence is utilized in criminal investigations and legal proceedings, advocating for legislative updates to address the growing importance of digital data in modern criminal cases. Furthermore, it underscores the need for careful consideration of privacy rights and proportionality when dealing with personal information obtained from digital devices and online platforms.

Analytical and Comparative JurisprudenceVol. 3(3)
Matej Bel University (SK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Digital and Cyber Forensics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.