Digital Technologies in Urban Regeneration: A Systematic Literature Review from the Perspectives of Stakeholders, Scales, and Stages

Urban regeneration, as a key strategy for promoting sustainable development of urban areas, requires innovative digital technologies to address increasingly complex urban challenges in its implementation. With the fast advancement of digital technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), Internet of Things (IoT), and big data, these technologies have extensively penetrated various dimensions of urban regeneration, from planning and design to implementation and post-operation management, providing new possibilities for improving urban regeneration efficiency and quality. However, the existing literature lacks a systematic evaluation of technology application patterns across different project scales and phases, comprehensive analysis of stakeholder–technology interactions, and quantitative assessment of technology distribution throughout the urban regeneration lifecycle. This research gap limits the in-depth understanding of how digital technologies can better support urban regeneration practices. This study aims to identify and quantify digital technology application patterns across urban regeneration stages, scales, and stakeholder configurations through systematic analysis of 56 high-quality articles from the Scopus and Web of Science databases. Using a mixed-methods approach combining a systematic literature review, bibliometric analysis, and meta-analysis, we categorized seven major digital technology types and analyzed their distribution patterns. Key findings reveal distinct temporal patterns: GIS and BIM/CIM technologies dominate in the pre-urban regeneration (Pre-UR) stage (10% and 12% application proportions, respectively). GIS applications increase significantly to 14% in post-urban regeneration (Post-UR) stage, while AI technology remains underutilized across all phases (2% in Pre-UR, decreasing to 1% in Post-UR). Meta-analysis reveals scale-dependent technology adoption patterns, with different technologies showing varying effectiveness at building-level, district-level, and city-level implementations. Research challenges include stakeholder digital divides, scale-dependent adoption barriers, and phase-specific implementation gaps. This study constructs a multi-dimensional analytical framework for digital technology support in urban regeneration, providing quantitative evidence for optimizing technology selection strategies. The framework offers practical guidance for policymakers and practitioners in developing context-appropriate digital technology deployment strategies for urban regeneration projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-07-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15142455
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Smart Cities and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.14

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Technologies in Urban Regeneration: A Systematic Literature Review from the Perspectives of Stakeholders, Scales, and Stages

Peng Chen, Hongyu Jin, Xiaer Xiahou, Yuchong Qian et al.
1 citations
Buildings
Smart Cities and Technologies
1.14
article

Digital Technologies in Urban Regeneration: A Systematic Literature Review from the Perspectives of Stakeholders, Scales, and Stages

Peng Chen, Hongyu Jin, Xiaer Xiahou, Yuchong Qian, Xiaoyue Ding
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Urban regeneration, as a key strategy for promoting sustainable development of urban areas, requires innovative digital technologies to address increasingly complex urban challenges in its implementation. With the fast advancement of digital technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), Internet of Things (IoT), and big data, these technologies have extensively penetrated various dimensions of urban regeneration, from planning and design to implementation and post-operation management, providing new possibilities for improving urban regeneration efficiency and quality. However, the existing literature lacks a systematic evaluation of technology application patterns across different project scales and phases, comprehensive analysis of stakeholder–technology interactions, and quantitative assessment of technology distribution throughout the urban regeneration lifecycle. This research gap limits the in-depth understanding of how digital technologies can better support urban regeneration practices. This study aims to identify and quantify digital technology application patterns across urban regeneration stages, scales, and stakeholder configurations through systematic analysis of 56 high-quality articles from the Scopus and Web of Science databases. Using a mixed-methods approach combining a systematic literature review, bibliometric analysis, and meta-analysis, we categorized seven major digital technology types and analyzed their distribution patterns. Key findings reveal distinct temporal patterns: GIS and BIM/CIM technologies dominate in the pre-urban regeneration (Pre-UR) stage (10% and 12% application proportions, respectively). GIS applications increase significantly to 14% in post-urban regeneration (Post-UR) stage, while AI technology remains underutilized across all phases (2% in Pre-UR, decreasing to 1% in Post-UR). Meta-analysis reveals scale-dependent technology adoption patterns, with different technologies showing varying effectiveness at building-level, district-level, and city-level implementations. Research challenges include stakeholder digital divides, scale-dependent adoption barriers, and phase-specific implementation gaps. This study constructs a multi-dimensional analytical framework for digital technology support in urban regeneration, providing quantitative evidence for optimizing technology selection strategies. The framework offers practical guidance for policymakers and practitioners in developing context-appropriate digital technology deployment strategies for urban regeneration projects.

BuildingsVol. 15(14)
University of Auckland (NZ), Nanjing Zhongyi Architectural Design Institute (China) (CN), Jiangsu Provincial Architectural Design and Research Institute (China) (CN), Southeast University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Smart Cities and Technologies
1.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.