An Investigation of Longitudinal Measurement Invariance and Item Response Theory Analysis of the LPFS‐BF 2.0 in a Large Clinical Norwegian Sample

The LPFS-BF 2.0 (Level of Personality Functioning-Brief Form 2.0) is a brief self-report instrument that was developed in order to gain a quick first impression of personality dysfunction and was designed to align with the Level of Personality Scale as outlined in the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD). In the current study, we used a factor analytic framework to evaluate the longitudinal measurement invariance of the Norwegian version of the LPFS-BF 2.0 in a sample of 1030 patients referred for personality disorder treatment with the R package lavaan. Additionally, we estimated item response theory (IRT) parameters for the 12 items, as well as local reliability, in order to facilitate comparisons with other studies. We found support for partial measurement invariance. Three items showed different thresholds across time points. However, these differences were minor and did not have a substantial impact on the estimated factor scores. The discrimination parameters were lower than could be expected for an instrument used in a clinical setting. Taking these findings together, we conclude that although the LPFS-BF 2.0 seems to measure the same latent trait across time, the items do not discriminate well between patients with high and low scores in a Norwegian population of adults seeking treatment for PD. Important next steps would be to estimate IRT parameters for comparable patient samples from other countries to assess the generalizability of our findings and to compare the LPFS-BF 2.0 scores to scores obtained through a clinical interview that aligns with the AMPD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personality and Mental Health
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.70032
Primary Topic
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Investigation of Longitudinal Measurement Invariance and Item Response Theory Analysis of the LPFS‐BF 2.0 in a Large Clinical Norwegian Sample

Muirne C. S. Paap, Jane Fjermestad‐Noll, Geir Pedersen, Elfrida Hartveit Kvarstein et al.
Personality and Mental Health
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
article

An Investigation of Longitudinal Measurement Invariance and Item Response Theory Analysis of the LPFS‐BF 2.0 in a Large Clinical Norwegian Sample

Muirne C. S. Paap, Jane Fjermestad‐Noll, Geir Pedersen, Elfrida Hartveit Kvarstein, Benjamin Hummelen, Sebastian A. J. Lortz
article en

Abstract

The LPFS-BF 2.0 (Level of Personality Functioning-Brief Form 2.0) is a brief self-report instrument that was developed in order to gain a quick first impression of personality dysfunction and was designed to align with the Level of Personality Scale as outlined in the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD). In the current study, we used a factor analytic framework to evaluate the longitudinal measurement invariance of the Norwegian version of the LPFS-BF 2.0 in a sample of 1030 patients referred for personality disorder treatment with the R package lavaan. Additionally, we estimated item response theory (IRT) parameters for the 12 items, as well as local reliability, in order to facilitate comparisons with other studies. We found support for partial measurement invariance. Three items showed different thresholds across time points. However, these differences were minor and did not have a substantial impact on the estimated factor scores. The discrimination parameters were lower than could be expected for an instrument used in a clinical setting. Taking these findings together, we conclude that although the LPFS-BF 2.0 seems to measure the same latent trait across time, the items do not discriminate well between patients with high and low scores in a Norwegian population of adults seeking treatment for PD. Important next steps would be to estimate IRT parameters for comparable patient samples from other countries to assess the generalizability of our findings and to compare the LPFS-BF 2.0 scores to scores obtained through a clinical interview that aligns with the AMPD.

Personality and Mental HealthVol. 19(3)
Oslo University Hospital (NO), University of Groningen (NL), University of Oslo (NO)
Diakonhjemmet, Haukeland Universitetssjukehus, Akershus Universitetssykehus
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.