Far-Right on the Offensive: Public Sphere Responses to the Extremist Attack in Macerata, Italy

This article examines public sphere responses to a far-right attack in Macerata, Italy, just before the 2018 national elections. Adopting a deliberative democratic perspective, we conduct a qualitative content analysis of newspaper articles discussing the attack. Our findings reveal a limited capacity for democratic resilience. The communication following the attack was neither reflective nor inclusive, despite the unanimous rejection of political violence by all political actors. The public debate was heavily influenced by the attacker’s views and those of his associates, while victims were marginalized. This was facilitated by far-right leaders who downplayed the attack’s significance and strategically exploited extremist ideas to advance their own political agendas during the heated electoral campaign. The response underscores a context with a powerful ascent of the far-right, including their extremist and violent manifestations, where liberal democratic institutions hold but deliberative qualities shrink.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Studies Review
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299251343747
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Far-Right on the Offensive: Public Sphere Responses to the Extremist Attack in Macerata, Italy

Andrea Felicetti, Andrea Terlizzi
Political Studies Review
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
article

Far-Right on the Offensive: Public Sphere Responses to the Extremist Attack in Macerata, Italy

Andrea Felicetti, Andrea Terlizzi
article en

Abstract

This article examines public sphere responses to a far-right attack in Macerata, Italy, just before the 2018 national elections. Adopting a deliberative democratic perspective, we conduct a qualitative content analysis of newspaper articles discussing the attack. Our findings reveal a limited capacity for democratic resilience. The communication following the attack was neither reflective nor inclusive, despite the unanimous rejection of political violence by all political actors. The public debate was heavily influenced by the attacker’s views and those of his associates, while victims were marginalized. This was facilitated by far-right leaders who downplayed the attack’s significance and strategically exploited extremist ideas to advance their own political agendas during the heated electoral campaign. The response underscores a context with a powerful ascent of the far-right, including their extremist and violent manifestations, where liberal democratic institutions hold but deliberative qualities shrink.

Political Studies Review
University of Padua (IT), University of Florence (IT)
Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Far-Right on the Offensive: Public Sphere Responses to the Extremist Attack in Macerata, Italy — Andrea Felicetti, Andrea Terlizzi · Political Studies Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS