Analyzing Digital Accessibility in Undergraduate UX Programs

Digital accessibility is fundamental to creating inclusive user experiences, yet it remains inconsistently integrated into undergraduate User Experience (UX) education. Many UX professionals have limited practice with accessibility, in part due to gaps in their formal education. This study examines how accessibility is incorporated into undergraduate UX programs by analyzing course descriptions and syllabi from three universities in the United States: University of Michigan Ann-Arbor, Purdue University, and the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Findings reveal that accessibility is rarely a core focus in UX curricula. While some courses reference accessibility, it is often implied rather than explicitly stated, and a syllabi review indicates inconsistent coverage. Accessibility is treated as a specialized topic, leaving students with limited exposure. This study thus highlights the need for greater integration of accessibility in UX education, emphasizing the importance of preparing future designers to create inclusive digital experiences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3742901.3742903
Primary Topic
Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing Digital Accessibility in Undergraduate UX Programs

Anna Williams, S. Ramanathan
Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
article

Analyzing Digital Accessibility in Undergraduate UX Programs

Anna Williams, S. Ramanathan
article en

Abstract

Digital accessibility is fundamental to creating inclusive user experiences, yet it remains inconsistently integrated into undergraduate User Experience (UX) education. Many UX professionals have limited practice with accessibility, in part due to gaps in their formal education. This study examines how accessibility is incorporated into undergraduate UX programs by analyzing course descriptions and syllabi from three universities in the United States: University of Michigan Ann-Arbor, Purdue University, and the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Findings reveal that accessibility is rarely a core focus in UX curricula. While some courses reference accessibility, it is often implied rather than explicitly stated, and a syllabi review indicates inconsistent coverage. Accessibility is treated as a specialized topic, leaving students with limited exposure. This study thus highlights the need for greater integration of accessibility in UX education, emphasizing the importance of preparing future designers to create inclusive digital experiences.

Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analyzing Digital Accessibility in Undergraduate UX Programs — Anna Williams, S. Ramanathan · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS