Local self-government and ensuring social justice: national experience and foreign practices

The article explores the role of local self-government in ensuring social justice as a fundamental principle of democratic society. Social justice is understood not only as equal access to social benefits but also as a real tool for shaping fair, inclusive, and sustainable territorial communities. The focus is placed on analyzing the current Ukrainian experience in this area, especially in the context of the decentralization reform, which has significantly expanded the powers and functions of local self-government bodies. Ukrainian communities are increasingly implementing social protection programs, adapting service delivery to local needs, and developing mechanisms for citizen participation. The article provides a detailed description of practices related to municipal assistance, social housing, inclusive education, medical services, and support for vulnerable groups. At the same time, systemic challenges are highlighted, such as financial disparities among communities, lack of qualified personnel, and limited legislative capacity at the local level, which hinder the full realization of the principles of social justice. In the context of comparative analysis, the foreign experiences of European Union countries (Germany, Sweden, France, Poland) and North America (Canada, the USA) are presented, where local self-government plays a leading role in social policy. The article outlines key models of social service organization, funding sources, partnerships with civil society institutions, participatory governance practices, and the adaptability of social programs. Special attention is paid to tools for assessing social impact, involving citizens in decision-making, and integrating justice principles into municipal budgeting. The experience of developed countries shows that the effectiveness of local social policy depends not only on formal powers but also on real autonomy, financial stability, and the institutional capacity of communities to manage social processes. Based on the analyzed experience, the article formulates proposals for improving the Ukrainian model of ensuring social justice at the local level. These include expanding the financial base of local self-government, granting communities greater autonomy in shaping social policy, developing systems for monitoring and evaluating decision effectiveness, improving the professional qualifications of social sector personnel, and actively involving citizens in governance processes. The article emphasizes that only through a comprehensive approach and consistent state support can local self-government bodies become genuine guarantors of social justice within communities, contributing to sustainable development, social cohesion, and an improved quality of life for the population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2025.03.1.20
Primary Topic
Economic Issues in Ukraine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Local self-government and ensuring social justice: national experience and foreign practices

Лариса НАЛИВАЙКО
Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence
Economic Issues in Ukraine
article

Local self-government and ensuring social justice: national experience and foreign practices

Лариса НАЛИВАЙКО
article en

Abstract

The article explores the role of local self-government in ensuring social justice as a fundamental principle of democratic society. Social justice is understood not only as equal access to social benefits but also as a real tool for shaping fair, inclusive, and sustainable territorial communities. The focus is placed on analyzing the current Ukrainian experience in this area, especially in the context of the decentralization reform, which has significantly expanded the powers and functions of local self-government bodies. Ukrainian communities are increasingly implementing social protection programs, adapting service delivery to local needs, and developing mechanisms for citizen participation. The article provides a detailed description of practices related to municipal assistance, social housing, inclusive education, medical services, and support for vulnerable groups. At the same time, systemic challenges are highlighted, such as financial disparities among communities, lack of qualified personnel, and limited legislative capacity at the local level, which hinder the full realization of the principles of social justice. In the context of comparative analysis, the foreign experiences of European Union countries (Germany, Sweden, France, Poland) and North America (Canada, the USA) are presented, where local self-government plays a leading role in social policy. The article outlines key models of social service organization, funding sources, partnerships with civil society institutions, participatory governance practices, and the adaptability of social programs. Special attention is paid to tools for assessing social impact, involving citizens in decision-making, and integrating justice principles into municipal budgeting. The experience of developed countries shows that the effectiveness of local social policy depends not only on formal powers but also on real autonomy, financial stability, and the institutional capacity of communities to manage social processes. Based on the analyzed experience, the article formulates proposals for improving the Ukrainian model of ensuring social justice at the local level. These include expanding the financial base of local self-government, granting communities greater autonomy in shaping social policy, developing systems for monitoring and evaluating decision effectiveness, improving the professional qualifications of social sector personnel, and actively involving citizens in governance processes. The article emphasizes that only through a comprehensive approach and consistent state support can local self-government bodies become genuine guarantors of social justice within communities, contributing to sustainable development, social cohesion, and an improved quality of life for the population.

Analytical and Comparative JurisprudenceVol. 1(3)
Max Planck Society (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Economic Issues in Ukraine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.