Surface Broadband Radiation Data from a Bipolar Perspective: Assessing Climate Change Through Machine Learning

Clouds modulate the net radiative flux that interacts with both shortwave (SW) and longwave (LW) radiation, but the uncertainties regarding their effect in polar regions are especially high because ground observations are lacking and evaluation through satellites is made difficult by high surface reflectance. In this work, sky conditions for six different polar stations, two in the Arctic (Ny-Ålesund and Utqiagvik [formerly Barrow]) and four in Antarctica (Neumayer, Syowa, South Pole, and Dome C) will be presented, considering the decade between 2010 and 2020. Measurements of broadband SW and LW radiation components (both downwelling and upwelling) are collected within the frame of the Baseline Surface Radiation Network (BSRN). Sky conditions—categorized as clear sky, cloudy, or overcast—were determined using cloud fraction estimates obtained through the RADFLUX method, which integrates shortwave (SW) and longwave (LW) radiative fluxes. RADFLUX was applied with daily fitting for all BSRN stations, producing two cloud fraction values: one derived from shortwave downward (SWD) measurements and the other from longwave downward (LWD) measurements. The variation in cloud fraction used to classify conditions from clear sky to overcast appeared consistent and reasonable when compared to seasonal changes in shortwave downward (SWD) and diffuse radiation (DIF), as well as longwave downward (LWD) and longwave upward (LWU) fluxes. These classifications served as labels for a machine learning-based classification task. Three algorithms were evaluated: Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and XGBoost. Input features include downward LW radiation, solar zenith angle, surface air temperature (Ta), relative humidity, and the ratio of water vapor pressure to Ta. Among these models, XGBoost achieved the highest balanced accuracy, with the best scores of 0.78 at Ny-Ålesund (Arctic) and 0.78 at Syowa (Antarctica). The evaluation employed a leave-one-year-out approach to ensure robust temporal validation. Finally, the results from cross-station models highlighted the need for deeper investigation, particularly through clustering stations with similar environmental and climatic characteristics to improve generalization and transferability across locations. Additionally, the use of feature normalization strategies proved effective in reducing inter-station variability and promoting more stable model performance across diverse settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Climate
Published
2025-07-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cli13070147
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surface Broadband Radiation Data from a Bipolar Perspective: Assessing Climate Change Through Machine Learning

Claudia Frangipani, Daniele Baracchi, Alice Cavaliere, Vito Vitale et al.
1 citations
Climate
Climate variability and models
1.11
article

Surface Broadband Radiation Data from a Bipolar Perspective: Assessing Climate Change Through Machine Learning

Claudia Frangipani, Daniele Baracchi, Alice Cavaliere, Vito Vitale, Maurizio Busetto, Angelo Lupi, Mauro Mazzola, Dasara Shullani, Simone Pulimeno
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Clouds modulate the net radiative flux that interacts with both shortwave (SW) and longwave (LW) radiation, but the uncertainties regarding their effect in polar regions are especially high because ground observations are lacking and evaluation through satellites is made difficult by high surface reflectance. In this work, sky conditions for six different polar stations, two in the Arctic (Ny-Ålesund and Utqiagvik [formerly Barrow]) and four in Antarctica (Neumayer, Syowa, South Pole, and Dome C) will be presented, considering the decade between 2010 and 2020. Measurements of broadband SW and LW radiation components (both downwelling and upwelling) are collected within the frame of the Baseline Surface Radiation Network (BSRN). Sky conditions—categorized as clear sky, cloudy, or overcast—were determined using cloud fraction estimates obtained through the RADFLUX method, which integrates shortwave (SW) and longwave (LW) radiative fluxes. RADFLUX was applied with daily fitting for all BSRN stations, producing two cloud fraction values: one derived from shortwave downward (SWD) measurements and the other from longwave downward (LWD) measurements. The variation in cloud fraction used to classify conditions from clear sky to overcast appeared consistent and reasonable when compared to seasonal changes in shortwave downward (SWD) and diffuse radiation (DIF), as well as longwave downward (LWD) and longwave upward (LWU) fluxes. These classifications served as labels for a machine learning-based classification task. Three algorithms were evaluated: Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and XGBoost. Input features include downward LW radiation, solar zenith angle, surface air temperature (Ta), relative humidity, and the ratio of water vapor pressure to Ta. Among these models, XGBoost achieved the highest balanced accuracy, with the best scores of 0.78 at Ny-Ålesund (Arctic) and 0.78 at Syowa (Antarctica). The evaluation employed a leave-one-year-out approach to ensure robust temporal validation. Finally, the results from cross-station models highlighted the need for deeper investigation, particularly through clustering stations with similar environmental and climatic characteristics to improve generalization and transferability across locations. Additionally, the use of feature normalization strategies proved effective in reducing inter-station variability and promoting more stable model performance across diverse settings.

ClimateVol. 13(7)
Ca' Foscari University of Venice (IT), Deutscher Wetterdienst (DE), Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate (IT), National Research Council (IT), University of Florence (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Climate variability and models
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.