Should Impediments in Operating of the Judiciary Justify (Retroactive) Extension of Statute of Limitations for Criminal Offences?

The interaction of the legislator with the matter of statute of limitations for criminal offences, declaratively related to the state of epidemic or its threat, prompts us to ask a more general question whether and to what extent is it possible and justified to extend the statute of limitations due to perturbations in the activities of the judiciary. Firstly, the study adopts a theoretical perspective, seeking justification for this type of modification. Secondly, it adopts a dogmatic point of view, trying to answer whether such interference would be possible under the current legal system. Finally, it evaluates the specific regulations contained in the so-called COVID Act.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska sectio G (Ius)
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17951/g.2025.72.1.61-76
Primary Topic
Criminal Law and Evidence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Should Impediments in Operating of the Judiciary Justify (Retroactive) Extension of Statute of Limitations for Criminal Offences?

Konrad Lipiński
Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska sectio G (Ius)
Criminal Law and Evidence
article

Should Impediments in Operating of the Judiciary Justify (Retroactive) Extension of Statute of Limitations for Criminal Offences?

Konrad Lipiński
article en

Abstract

The interaction of the legislator with the matter of statute of limitations for criminal offences, declaratively related to the state of epidemic or its threat, prompts us to ask a more general question whether and to what extent is it possible and justified to extend the statute of limitations due to perturbations in the activities of the judiciary. Firstly, the study adopts a theoretical perspective, seeking justification for this type of modification. Secondly, it adopts a dogmatic point of view, trying to answer whether such interference would be possible under the current legal system. Finally, it evaluates the specific regulations contained in the so-called COVID Act.

Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska sectio G (Ius)Vol. 72(1)
University of Wrocław (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Criminal Law and Evidence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.