Direct Injection vs. Rebroadcasting and Broadcasting Concessions: Conclusions on the Background of the Amendments to the Copyright Law

The article refers to the issue of direct injection. This is a new technology used by broadcasters. It is relevant to copyright law. The obligation to implement the relevant regulations in the field in question came to the Polish legislator from EU law. The idea behind the establishment of regulations relating to direct injection is as follows. Direct injection is not, in itself, a field of exploitation of a work (subject of related rights). It is a kind of technology that can be used both in the process of primary broadcasting and in the process of rebroadcasting (secondary broadcasting). Emphasizing this is important because it is not without significance for the enforcement of various copyright provisions. Some of them are important for creators (as they relate to remuneration for the exploitation of a work). The author analyzes the concept of direct injection and considers whether it has been properly implemented in Polish legislation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska sectio G (Ius)
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17951/g.2025.72.1.99-117
Primary Topic
Copyright and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Direct Injection vs. Rebroadcasting and Broadcasting Concessions: Conclusions on the Background of the Amendments to the Copyright Law

Adrian Niewęgłowski
Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska sectio G (Ius)
Copyright and Intellectual Property
article

Direct Injection vs. Rebroadcasting and Broadcasting Concessions: Conclusions on the Background of the Amendments to the Copyright Law

Adrian Niewęgłowski
article en

Abstract

The article refers to the issue of direct injection. This is a new technology used by broadcasters. It is relevant to copyright law. The obligation to implement the relevant regulations in the field in question came to the Polish legislator from EU law. The idea behind the establishment of regulations relating to direct injection is as follows. Direct injection is not, in itself, a field of exploitation of a work (subject of related rights). It is a kind of technology that can be used both in the process of primary broadcasting and in the process of rebroadcasting (secondary broadcasting). Emphasizing this is important because it is not without significance for the enforcement of various copyright provisions. Some of them are important for creators (as they relate to remuneration for the exploitation of a work). The author analyzes the concept of direct injection and considers whether it has been properly implemented in Polish legislation.

Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska sectio G (Ius)Vol. 72(1)
Maria Curie-Skłodowska University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Copyright and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Direct Injection vs. Rebroadcasting and Broadcasting Concessions: Conclusions on the Background of the Amendments to the Copyright Law — Adrian Niewęgłowski · Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska sectio G (Ius) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS